WhoToTrust7
@whototrust7.bsky.social
Observer, analyst, and illuminator of all things Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
Where was his fight when he could have challenged the election of an insurrectionist?
February 8, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Where was his fight when he could have challenged the election of an insurrectionist?
You mean like you stayed silent when people were calling for 14/3 disqualification of dt before he was certified and sworn in so that none of this would have happened in the first place?
February 6, 2025 at 5:25 PM
You mean like you stayed silent when people were calling for 14/3 disqualification of dt before he was certified and sworn in so that none of this would have happened in the first place?
Quite frankly, I wouldn't have been surprised if they'd had one of those Superman "super" villain maps on display.
February 5, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Quite frankly, I wouldn't have been surprised if they'd had one of those Superman "super" villain maps on display.
Then why did Sagan write the book Contact to include the opposite message?
January 26, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Then why did Sagan write the book Contact to include the opposite message?
To anyone else reading this, that user did block me.
So the question is: Is someone having an issue with removing a political influence on what is supposed to be an A-political governmental agency/entity suspect, or not?
So the question is: Is someone having an issue with removing a political influence on what is supposed to be an A-political governmental agency/entity suspect, or not?
January 25, 2025 at 7:51 PM
To anyone else reading this, that user did block me.
So the question is: Is someone having an issue with removing a political influence on what is supposed to be an A-political governmental agency/entity suspect, or not?
So the question is: Is someone having an issue with removing a political influence on what is supposed to be an A-political governmental agency/entity suspect, or not?
No, it's what YOU are trying to do, discredit/dismiss a legitimate concern...even though you basically just confirmed the political nature of what should be A-political.
Again, why is that?
You blocking such discussion would just as easily confirm your intent here as suspect, but be my guest.
Again, why is that?
You blocking such discussion would just as easily confirm your intent here as suspect, but be my guest.
January 25, 2025 at 7:43 PM
No, it's what YOU are trying to do, discredit/dismiss a legitimate concern...even though you basically just confirmed the political nature of what should be A-political.
Again, why is that?
You blocking such discussion would just as easily confirm your intent here as suspect, but be my guest.
Again, why is that?
You blocking such discussion would just as easily confirm your intent here as suspect, but be my guest.
That you've tried to characterize my legitimate concern as "venting" only made your intent in this discussion more suspect.
Regardless, based on both of YOUR inputs; "no one pays attention to them anyway", "none of them are trustworthy"...why not eliminate foxs' presence so it's not even an issue?
Regardless, based on both of YOUR inputs; "no one pays attention to them anyway", "none of them are trustworthy"...why not eliminate foxs' presence so it's not even an issue?
January 25, 2025 at 7:35 PM
That you've tried to characterize my legitimate concern as "venting" only made your intent in this discussion more suspect.
Regardless, based on both of YOUR inputs; "no one pays attention to them anyway", "none of them are trustworthy"...why not eliminate foxs' presence so it's not even an issue?
Regardless, based on both of YOUR inputs; "no one pays attention to them anyway", "none of them are trustworthy"...why not eliminate foxs' presence so it's not even an issue?
…and besides, do members of the military even need ANY news being televised in their work spaces to be able to do the jobs they’re there to do? What exactly was your point there, and why are you still implying no one should be considering this?
January 25, 2025 at 6:58 PM
…and besides, do members of the military even need ANY news being televised in their work spaces to be able to do the jobs they’re there to do? What exactly was your point there, and why are you still implying no one should be considering this?
Given that fox “news” is basically pro-russia at this point, the fact that it is televised on U.S. military bases (entities that are supposed to be a-political) that smacks of a foreign influence operation.
AND, that it’s owner is not even from the U.S. (in case you weren’t aware of that fact).
AND, that it’s owner is not even from the U.S. (in case you weren’t aware of that fact).
January 25, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Given that fox “news” is basically pro-russia at this point, the fact that it is televised on U.S. military bases (entities that are supposed to be a-political) that smacks of a foreign influence operation.
AND, that it’s owner is not even from the U.S. (in case you weren’t aware of that fact).
AND, that it’s owner is not even from the U.S. (in case you weren’t aware of that fact).
Except for the fact that what I’m doing can’t be considered “arguing” when you’ve ignored my main point, that fox “news” should not be present on U.S. military bases.
It doesn't matter who does or does not pay attention to it, it’s whether it should even be present.
It doesn't matter who does or does not pay attention to it, it’s whether it should even be present.
January 25, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Except for the fact that what I’m doing can’t be considered “arguing” when you’ve ignored my main point, that fox “news” should not be present on U.S. military bases.
It doesn't matter who does or does not pay attention to it, it’s whether it should even be present.
It doesn't matter who does or does not pay attention to it, it’s whether it should even be present.
I am not trying to alienate anyone, I'm asking them to consider a negative influence on U.S. military bases...an influence individuals don't even need to pay conscious attention to for it to have a subconscious negative effect, especially on those who won't even consider that as a possibility.
January 25, 2025 at 5:05 PM
I am not trying to alienate anyone, I'm asking them to consider a negative influence on U.S. military bases...an influence individuals don't even need to pay conscious attention to for it to have a subconscious negative effect, especially on those who won't even consider that as a possibility.
No, you just keep conveniently neglecting to address fox "news" specifically as even being a potential problem.
Why is that?
Given all we know about it as a right-wing propaganda channel, why have you not agreed its message should not even be present on US military bases?
Why is that?
Given all we know about it as a right-wing propaganda channel, why have you not agreed its message should not even be present on US military bases?
January 25, 2025 at 4:51 PM
No, you just keep conveniently neglecting to address fox "news" specifically as even being a potential problem.
Why is that?
Given all we know about it as a right-wing propaganda channel, why have you not agreed its message should not even be present on US military bases?
Why is that?
Given all we know about it as a right-wing propaganda channel, why have you not agreed its message should not even be present on US military bases?
I wasn't talking about or generalizing individual soldiers, nor did I ever mention the word "fascists".
I was talking about what soldiers are subjected to on military bases.
That you couldn't make those distinctions for yourself wasn't exactly confidence inspiring.
I was talking about what soldiers are subjected to on military bases.
That you couldn't make those distinctions for yourself wasn't exactly confidence inspiring.
January 24, 2025 at 9:29 PM
I wasn't talking about or generalizing individual soldiers, nor did I ever mention the word "fascists".
I was talking about what soldiers are subjected to on military bases.
That you couldn't make those distinctions for yourself wasn't exactly confidence inspiring.
I was talking about what soldiers are subjected to on military bases.
That you couldn't make those distinctions for yourself wasn't exactly confidence inspiring.
Depends how many military bases around the world still have all of their tv's tuned to fox "news".
Anyone still think that is by accident?
Anyone still think that is by accident?
January 24, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Depends how many military bases around the world still have all of their tv's tuned to fox "news".
Anyone still think that is by accident?
Anyone still think that is by accident?
....and pete hegseths....
January 22, 2025 at 3:48 PM
....and pete hegseths....
....and pete hegseths...
January 22, 2025 at 3:48 PM
....and pete hegseths...
Work with and help fund Jessica Denson and the team at Election Truth United to spread their messages more widely to the American people that dt disqualified himself Constitutionally from being potus with Jan 6, and THEN stole the 2024 election with the help of musk.
Far too many just don't know.
Far too many just don't know.
January 22, 2025 at 4:59 AM
Work with and help fund Jessica Denson and the team at Election Truth United to spread their messages more widely to the American people that dt disqualified himself Constitutionally from being potus with Jan 6, and THEN stole the 2024 election with the help of musk.
Far too many just don't know.
Far too many just don't know.
Which they already did last time around by separating and losing thousands of children in a purposeful bureaucratic shuffle, which they have recently been blaming on the Biden administration..."alternative facts" which their supporters have accepted no questions asked.
January 18, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Which they already did last time around by separating and losing thousands of children in a purposeful bureaucratic shuffle, which they have recently been blaming on the Biden administration..."alternative facts" which their supporters have accepted no questions asked.
If you start a club, let me know.
I feel like I've already been a member for years. 😉
I feel like I've already been a member for years. 😉
January 17, 2025 at 1:21 AM
If you start a club, let me know.
I feel like I've already been a member for years. 😉
I feel like I've already been a member for years. 😉
This is not even a scenario Dems/Libs should be giving ANY airtime.
The maga "right" may want the world to operate with a juvenile WWE mentality like they do, but that is no reason for the adults in the room to even stoop to the level of talking about it.
The maga "right" may want the world to operate with a juvenile WWE mentality like they do, but that is no reason for the adults in the room to even stoop to the level of talking about it.
January 15, 2025 at 11:07 PM
This is not even a scenario Dems/Libs should be giving ANY airtime.
The maga "right" may want the world to operate with a juvenile WWE mentality like they do, but that is no reason for the adults in the room to even stoop to the level of talking about it.
The maga "right" may want the world to operate with a juvenile WWE mentality like they do, but that is no reason for the adults in the room to even stoop to the level of talking about it.
Whatever works to remove cannon from the equation of influence/interference IMO.
January 14, 2025 at 5:21 AM
Whatever works to remove cannon from the equation of influence/interference IMO.
Does Garland not have the authority to just drop the charges against trumps maralago, co-conspirator/employees so that cannons' legal reason (to ensure an untainted jury trial) no longer applies for her blocking the release of Smiths' report?
Why force all this just to put THOSE two guys in jail?
Why force all this just to put THOSE two guys in jail?
January 13, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Does Garland not have the authority to just drop the charges against trumps maralago, co-conspirator/employees so that cannons' legal reason (to ensure an untainted jury trial) no longer applies for her blocking the release of Smiths' report?
Why force all this just to put THOSE two guys in jail?
Why force all this just to put THOSE two guys in jail?
Failed us SO FAR....
January 13, 2025 at 5:18 PM
Failed us SO FAR....
....so if her excuse is eliminated...her "legal" reason for blocking is also eliminated.
MUCH more important that the public knows the FULL report (for deciding about 14/3) than two country club employees being held accountable, especially when they were just following their boss' orders.
MUCH more important that the public knows the FULL report (for deciding about 14/3) than two country club employees being held accountable, especially when they were just following their boss' orders.
January 13, 2025 at 5:18 PM
....so if her excuse is eliminated...her "legal" reason for blocking is also eliminated.
MUCH more important that the public knows the FULL report (for deciding about 14/3) than two country club employees being held accountable, especially when they were just following their boss' orders.
MUCH more important that the public knows the FULL report (for deciding about 14/3) than two country club employees being held accountable, especially when they were just following their boss' orders.