Eric
@whogoncleanitup.bsky.social
I play (video) games and bet on (sports) games and lose all my money playing (best ball) games. #Veteran
Sushi Glory Hole was a banger of a comeback.
November 16, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Sushi Glory Hole was a banger of a comeback.
Squeaky wheel game for Rome’s dad, anyway.
November 7, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Squeaky wheel game for Rome’s dad, anyway.
This scenario rules because we’re saying Poles is dumb for picking the consensus number 1 and should have traded down so another GM can draft the consensus number 1 QB and Poles can outsmart him.
Poles sucks, but can’t blame him for Caleb not being an NFL QB. Everyone was making that pick.
Poles sucks, but can’t blame him for Caleb not being an NFL QB. Everyone was making that pick.
October 28, 2025 at 2:50 AM
This scenario rules because we’re saying Poles is dumb for picking the consensus number 1 and should have traded down so another GM can draft the consensus number 1 QB and Poles can outsmart him.
Poles sucks, but can’t blame him for Caleb not being an NFL QB. Everyone was making that pick.
Poles sucks, but can’t blame him for Caleb not being an NFL QB. Everyone was making that pick.
I want him in a bears uniform in Ben Johnson’s system *so* much.
October 18, 2025 at 11:57 PM
I want him in a bears uniform in Ben Johnson’s system *so* much.
Don’t think anyone’s advocating for building a franchise around him but he’s got a ~70% completion percentage and 3 TDs and you’re calling him abysmal.
October 17, 2025 at 2:40 AM
Don’t think anyone’s advocating for building a franchise around him but he’s got a ~70% completion percentage and 3 TDs and you’re calling him abysmal.
No, it’s not, but it is what you’re trying to make it. Have a good day.
October 16, 2025 at 8:24 PM
No, it’s not, but it is what you’re trying to make it. Have a good day.
No one is allowed to be upset about more than one thing at once, nor is their outrage allowed to be on a sliding scale. Got it.
October 16, 2025 at 7:37 PM
No one is allowed to be upset about more than one thing at once, nor is their outrage allowed to be on a sliding scale. Got it.
100% of the clips I caught on redzone yesterday were that guy being unabashedly excited about everything. It ruled.
October 6, 2025 at 1:34 PM
100% of the clips I caught on redzone yesterday were that guy being unabashedly excited about everything. It ruled.
The question isn’t about court idiot. A first hand statement isn’t hearsay. It’s a first hand account.
October 4, 2025 at 10:18 PM
The question isn’t about court idiot. A first hand statement isn’t hearsay. It’s a first hand account.
Hey who writes Wikipedia?
October 4, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Hey who writes Wikipedia?
It’s not a word man. Google is run by AI. That’s why when you type it here on bluesky it has red lines underneath it. More shit for you to be wrong about.
October 4, 2025 at 10:17 PM
It’s not a word man. Google is run by AI. That’s why when you type it here on bluesky it has red lines underneath it. More shit for you to be wrong about.
You didn’t answer my question. What if Susan is right there and says “yeah I said that”
October 4, 2025 at 10:15 PM
You didn’t answer my question. What if Susan is right there and says “yeah I said that”
Checkable is a word. That’s not what you wrote though.
October 4, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Checkable is a word. That’s not what you wrote though.
You should click on some of these links, they’re very informative to laypeople like you that use words like “checkably”
October 4, 2025 at 10:12 PM
You should click on some of these links, they’re very informative to laypeople like you that use words like “checkably”
To prove that Tom was in town a witness testifies “Susan told me that Tom was in town." Because the witness's evidence relies on an out-of-court statement that Susan made, if Susan is unavailable for cross-examination, the answer is hearsay.
What happens if Susan is IN COURT?!?
What happens if Susan is IN COURT?!?
October 4, 2025 at 10:12 PM
To prove that Tom was in town a witness testifies “Susan told me that Tom was in town." Because the witness's evidence relies on an out-of-court statement that Susan made, if Susan is unavailable for cross-examination, the answer is hearsay.
What happens if Susan is IN COURT?!?
What happens if Susan is IN COURT?!?
The fuck is checkably?
October 4, 2025 at 10:10 PM
The fuck is checkably?
Hell yeah, die on that fucking hill moron. Let’s go!
October 4, 2025 at 10:08 PM
Hell yeah, die on that fucking hill moron. Let’s go!
Hell yes please don’t delete this, it’ll look great next to the definition of hearsay I posted.
October 4, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Hell yes please don’t delete this, it’ll look great next to the definition of hearsay I posted.
Definition of hearsay: An out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting it.
Fuck off now, please.
Fuck off now, please.
October 4, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Definition of hearsay: An out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting it.
Fuck off now, please.
Fuck off now, please.
First-hand accounts aren’t hearsay, would you like to try again?
October 4, 2025 at 10:01 PM
First-hand accounts aren’t hearsay, would you like to try again?
“Eyewitness testimony isn’t evidence, only what I say counts is actually evidence.”
October 4, 2025 at 9:58 PM
“Eyewitness testimony isn’t evidence, only what I say counts is actually evidence.”