Has absolutely probable as this clip was I had to double check. It’s real and There’s more than the interview.

youtu.be/FwEKCP7DVFc

What if it’s impossible to meter out the most dangerous person in an administration entirely made up of people all actively working at doing the most possible harm?

Inequality has ballooned. You forgot that one.

Also the AI bubble is thinning.

I could go on….

What we would like to read is the unredacted documentation. All of it.

The opioid settlement is what I was referring to, yes. It protected the guilty and there were no serious consequences.

Fucking finally

Great, but…a SETTLEMENT?!

It should have been an outright win.

That’s like settling with the sacklers but for real estate instead of drugs.

By the way, homelessness is a huge driver of drug addiction.

If these huge companies aren’t ever actually held responsible this shit keeps happening.

Also, when a court encounters a situation for which there is no law then there should be a review process rather than a haphazard ruling. A legislative review should be triggered.

What do y’all think?

Laws should be generally less convoluted and they should undergo a test period. Also they should come with explanation of their intended use. You don’t teach math and science history without a textbook explaining the contest and concepts.

However, many laws are indeed traps because the general public have very little knowledge of the law. There are so many counterintuitive, illogical, and even immoral laws that seem almost designed to catch people slipping, they know not where. I think this needs to change.

Hope you’re right

This probably passes for comedy im the turning point crowd