Every. Single. One.

You think that what we call "superior intelligence" in a measurement is still okay because one just has it. Like one just has anything. Eugenics sounds like it would disagree and eradicate natural diversity. But planning a pregnancy isn't unnatural either.

Is that saying that if you do have more from a scientific perspective, it doesn't really exist? Some people are more or less interesting. And we find different things interesting. If we're really equal in my mind you don't exclude that stuff.

I initially meant the disbelief in superiority and hiarchy. Which if you don't understand, you can find ideas relevant by looking up on topics such as eugenics. But is that superior ideology, or is that suggesting you can like anything more?

So I like all of that...

Different people include everyone regardless of whether they're in your community (or a community) or not. Then equalism is just existing. Another perspective I thought I like is the fact that different levels of intelligence can still be distinguished without sugar coating it.

Knowing one person can take a lot of time.. but I guess it depends on the traits. But in my ideal world, there's no vote on who gets to be and who doesn't.

It's your field, so your own idea can still be taken for what it is without exaggeration.

Our perceptions can be vastly different. The meaning behind an illustration or piece of work is what the artist intended. A mindset itself isn't illegal. Accepting everyone as equal can't just exclude what someone is. But like anyone, you're not expert at everything.