Coop
@whereisdalecooper.bsky.social
Somewhere between here and the Black Lodge
What's also been revealed is that these journalists are phenomenally stupid - as if we haven't seen them journalling their thoughts online every day for nearly 20 years.
February 8, 2026 at 12:19 AM
What's also been revealed is that these journalists are phenomenally stupid - as if we haven't seen them journalling their thoughts online every day for nearly 20 years.
I'm so sorry, mate.
Send me a text if you need support.
Send me a text if you need support.
January 24, 2026 at 9:56 PM
I'm so sorry, mate.
Send me a text if you need support.
Send me a text if you need support.
Swearing isn’t proof of “low attainment,” it’s proof that language is flexible. Working-class voices don’t need to be judged against middle-class debate club standards to be valid. What you’ve written is respectability politics dressed up as sociology.
August 26, 2025 at 2:01 AM
Swearing isn’t proof of “low attainment,” it’s proof that language is flexible. Working-class voices don’t need to be judged against middle-class debate club standards to be valid. What you’ve written is respectability politics dressed up as sociology.
Nothing screams ‘nuance’ like contradicting yourself three times in a row and then calling people stupid for noticing.
August 25, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Nothing screams ‘nuance’ like contradicting yourself three times in a row and then calling people stupid for noticing.
Labour’s Brexit ‘flip-flop’ didn’t happen in a vacuum - it was the result of relentless pressure from MPs, media, and yes, Lib Dems pushing ‘Revoke.’ Your party helped create the very wedge you now pin solely on Corbyn.
August 25, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Labour’s Brexit ‘flip-flop’ didn’t happen in a vacuum - it was the result of relentless pressure from MPs, media, and yes, Lib Dems pushing ‘Revoke.’ Your party helped create the very wedge you now pin solely on Corbyn.
Pick one: Corbyn cost 2019, Corbyn didn’t cost 2019, or the Lib Dems sabotaged themselves. Claiming all three at once and yelling ‘melt’ isn’t a rebuttal, it’s pure incoherence.
August 25, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Pick one: Corbyn cost 2019, Corbyn didn’t cost 2019, or the Lib Dems sabotaged themselves. Claiming all three at once and yelling ‘melt’ isn’t a rebuttal, it’s pure incoherence.
Which I say in response to your earlier, erroneous claims about Corbyn ‘costing 2019’ - claims that crumble once you factor in the Lib Dems’ own coalition record and the Revoke fiasco.
August 25, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Which I say in response to your earlier, erroneous claims about Corbyn ‘costing 2019’ - claims that crumble once you factor in the Lib Dems’ own coalition record and the Revoke fiasco.
“From ‘Corbyn cost 2019’ to ‘I never blamed Corbyn’ to ‘actually I opposed Lib Dem strategy’ - all in three posts, capped with a block threat.
That’s not an argument, it’s a panic attack in real time.
Good talk
That’s not an argument, it’s a panic attack in real time.
Good talk
August 25, 2025 at 7:57 PM
“From ‘Corbyn cost 2019’ to ‘I never blamed Corbyn’ to ‘actually I opposed Lib Dem strategy’ - all in three posts, capped with a block threat.
That’s not an argument, it’s a panic attack in real time.
Good talk
That’s not an argument, it’s a panic attack in real time.
Good talk
12 seats because you were punished twice: 2015 for propping up Cameron’s austerity, and 2019 for the hubris of ‘Revoke’ and ‘Jo for PM’.
Both self-inflicted, both deserved.
That’s the real record.
Both self-inflicted, both deserved.
That’s the real record.
August 25, 2025 at 7:52 PM
12 seats because you were punished twice: 2015 for propping up Cameron’s austerity, and 2019 for the hubris of ‘Revoke’ and ‘Jo for PM’.
Both self-inflicted, both deserved.
That’s the real record.
Both self-inflicted, both deserved.
That’s the real record.
Calling ‘affordable rent’ social housing doesn’t make it so. Council-built or not, if rents are pegged to 80% of Guildford’s market rates, that’s not the 50% level real social rent promises. The gap isn’t semantic, it’s material.
August 25, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Calling ‘affordable rent’ social housing doesn’t make it so. Council-built or not, if rents are pegged to 80% of Guildford’s market rates, that’s not the 50% level real social rent promises. The gap isn’t semantic, it’s material.
And it's funny how Lib Dems always skip their own role in 2019.
‘Revoke Article 50’ was a strategic suicide note - splitting Remain, feeding Johnson’s ‘anti-democratic elite’ frame, and helping him crush Labour.
Pinning it all on Corbyn is just convenient amnesia
‘Revoke Article 50’ was a strategic suicide note - splitting Remain, feeding Johnson’s ‘anti-democratic elite’ frame, and helping him crush Labour.
Pinning it all on Corbyn is just convenient amnesia
August 25, 2025 at 7:49 PM
And it's funny how Lib Dems always skip their own role in 2019.
‘Revoke Article 50’ was a strategic suicide note - splitting Remain, feeding Johnson’s ‘anti-democratic elite’ frame, and helping him crush Labour.
Pinning it all on Corbyn is just convenient amnesia
‘Revoke Article 50’ was a strategic suicide note - splitting Remain, feeding Johnson’s ‘anti-democratic elite’ frame, and helping him crush Labour.
Pinning it all on Corbyn is just convenient amnesia
Awful? That Lib Dems were invisible while renters faced eviction, carers begged for PPE, UC cuts loomed, and housing insecurity deepened. You weren’t bold, you weren’t leading - you were inconsequential.
August 25, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Awful? That Lib Dems were invisible while renters faced eviction, carers begged for PPE, UC cuts loomed, and housing insecurity deepened. You weren’t bold, you weren’t leading - you were inconsequential.
And Guildford’s new housing wave isn’t all social rented. Most of it is "affordable rent" or shared ownership - far from the 50% market rent that real social housing promises. Flaws start at the language.
August 25, 2025 at 7:44 PM
And Guildford’s new housing wave isn’t all social rented. Most of it is "affordable rent" or shared ownership - far from the 50% market rent that real social housing promises. Flaws start at the language.
Your personal record doesn’t erase the party’s. You ran under the Lib Dem banner - during coalition, during austerity, during the pandemic. You don’t get to claim the badge when it flatters and disown it when it damns.
August 25, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Your personal record doesn’t erase the party’s. You ran under the Lib Dem banner - during coalition, during austerity, during the pandemic. You don’t get to claim the badge when it flatters and disown it when it damns.
Also, you are bragging about ‘building social housing’during a global pandemic where the Lib Dems were invisible, offered nothing bold on housing, and watched insecurity deepen.
This isn’t just revisionism. It’s tone-deaf delusions of grandeur.
This isn’t just revisionism. It’s tone-deaf delusions of grandeur.
August 25, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Also, you are bragging about ‘building social housing’during a global pandemic where the Lib Dems were invisible, offered nothing bold on housing, and watched insecurity deepen.
This isn’t just revisionism. It’s tone-deaf delusions of grandeur.
This isn’t just revisionism. It’s tone-deaf delusions of grandeur.
During the 2010–15 coalition, social housebuilding collapsed to record lows. Lib Dems signed off on scrapping funding, pushing fake “affordable rent,” extending Right to Buy, and backing austerity that gutted councils.
But by all means, continue pissing down our backs and telling us it is raining.
But by all means, continue pissing down our backs and telling us it is raining.
August 25, 2025 at 7:23 PM
During the 2010–15 coalition, social housebuilding collapsed to record lows. Lib Dems signed off on scrapping funding, pushing fake “affordable rent,” extending Right to Buy, and backing austerity that gutted councils.
But by all means, continue pissing down our backs and telling us it is raining.
But by all means, continue pissing down our backs and telling us it is raining.
People don’t take you seriously because you parrot lines from a petty criminal and football hooligan with no expertise in politics, religion, or immigration. He’s not educated, not well-read, and a proven liar. That isn’t analysis, it’s propaganda - and you look gullible repeating it.
August 25, 2025 at 8:47 AM
People don’t take you seriously because you parrot lines from a petty criminal and football hooligan with no expertise in politics, religion, or immigration. He’s not educated, not well-read, and a proven liar. That isn’t analysis, it’s propaganda - and you look gullible repeating it.
There’s absolutely no proof of ‘mass unvetted immigration from Muslim countries’ because it isn’t happening. UK immigration is tightly controlled, dominated by work and study visas from India, Nigeria, and China.
August 25, 2025 at 8:46 AM
There’s absolutely no proof of ‘mass unvetted immigration from Muslim countries’ because it isn’t happening. UK immigration is tightly controlled, dominated by work and study visas from India, Nigeria, and China.
No, the top immigrant groups are Indians, Nigerians, Chinese - and then Pakistanis. That doesn’t add up to 70% from Muslim countries. Asylum seekers are one slice of the pie, not the whole, and only 40% are representative of Muslim countries
August 25, 2025 at 8:40 AM
No, the top immigrant groups are Indians, Nigerians, Chinese - and then Pakistanis. That doesn’t add up to 70% from Muslim countries. Asylum seekers are one slice of the pie, not the whole, and only 40% are representative of Muslim countries
No - most immigrants aren’t from Muslim-majority countries. Migration today is predominantly non-EU, with countries like India, Nigeria, and China leading. Asylum seekers from Muslim nations are only one subset. It’s fearmongering to lump them all together.
August 25, 2025 at 8:28 AM
No - most immigrants aren’t from Muslim-majority countries. Migration today is predominantly non-EU, with countries like India, Nigeria, and China leading. Asylum seekers from Muslim nations are only one subset. It’s fearmongering to lump them all together.
You insist this is about having an ‘adult discussion’ but you’ve brought nothing to the table except reheated Powell-era talking points about ‘enclaves’ and doom. That’s not discussion, it’s just monologue dressed up as debate. An adult conversation needs evidence, not slogans.
August 25, 2025 at 8:26 AM
You insist this is about having an ‘adult discussion’ but you’ve brought nothing to the table except reheated Powell-era talking points about ‘enclaves’ and doom. That’s not discussion, it’s just monologue dressed up as debate. An adult conversation needs evidence, not slogans.