There was me thinking we left the nasty twats on Twitter... appears not.

But this bill won't help that you have to have a 6 month prognosis on terminal illness and be lucid enough to make the decision.

Not wishing to be cynical but, with current shortages of doctors and judges, most patients would be dead before a decision could be taken.
I've discussed assisted dying with a Belgian friend; they have that option similar to NL and CH. It seems kinder to remove the fear of an agonised end.

2. This bill will apply to very few people. It requires two independent Dr's and a high court judge.

1. What people are not understanding is that this bill is only relevant to terminal illness within 6 months of prognosis. The decision made by the patient when lucid. It needs much deeper discussion before rushing through. Yes, everyone has a right to choice, but as it stands.

You're safe here, sweetheart 💕

It is only allowing 5 hours for a debate on such an important subject. It is disgraceful 😑

I am sorry to hear that. I agree it's personal choice, I am just very nervous of a bill reading on a Friday and how many will attend. I feel there will likely be more abstentions than votes.

Foxes in the hen house.