I don’t know that I would describe Bibi as smart. Otherwise, this scans.

US Foreign Policy Under Trump is now officially monkey see monkey do

Or you know she could give 10% of the money she earns for her waspy mediocrity to those in need? Nah let’s applaud her for buying back bland.

Even if 100K of those were his kids, he would not care. Literally everything he does at this point is about pumping up adulation from his incel fanboys.

Hey Kremlin. You lost.

That is not something that constitutionally the federal government can do. It is exclusively a matter of provincial jurisdiction. Fake solutions are not actual solutions.

They are just seeing the world through a different lens. Trudeau: not a climate change denier. Carney not a climate change denier. Trudeau: not transphobic. Carney: not transphobic. Trudeau not anti-science. Carney: not anti science. Trudeau: not a nativist. Carney: not a nativist. See? The same.

I think Poilievre message is in reality “I am listening to some Canadians concerns” — he prefers the concerns of a certain type of Canadian. No one believes he is listening to or speaking for those outside his base.

Go look at the Macleans article where he said the same thing exact opposite, Comrade.

You are kidding right? Conservatives love love love lies. Just ask Trump. He is in record as saying the reason he became a Republic is that you idiots have the most gullible voters. Tell Putin your lies don’t work here, comrade.

No. A tax cut for the wealthy is one that cuts the marginal tax rates at the higher income brackets. Carney’s cuts the lowest bracket. The reason it scales up to 50k is that those well below 50k do not pay much in terms of federal income tax, so there is not much to cut.

I already explained why. Even if you look at it your way it is hardly a tax cut for the rich. It is fairly close for tax brackets from 50k - 129k — and there drops after 129 k. Unless you think making 50k is rich, calling it a tax cut for the rich is disingenuous.

Sure, on your way so, I guess.

Because that’s how people who need the tax cut look at it. 100 dollars in tax relief means a lot more to someone making 50k than $125 does to someone making 200k.

Hardly. A vast chunk of his career was providing a stable environment to help increase economic growth for all. Also, he has extensively written about the risks of wealth inequality. He is no Milton Freeman or Alan Greenspan.

Only to a modest degree. It is certainly not a tax cut for the rich. Also when you look at the value of the cut as a proportion of total income the scale reverses. To put it another way, the cuts are more meaningful to those in lower income tax brackets.

This is not my beautiful house. This is not my beautiful wife.

That said everyone seems to think they need to propose a tax cut, so PP doesn’t scoop the entire low information voter bracket into his merry band of fascists.