Musk’s role in shaping this moment is a reminder: the fight for social media is deeply political. The internet’s future depends on us demanding better.

What’s next for our digital spaces?

Social media doesn’t have to serve corporate interests. We need platforms that prioritize equity, safety, and transparency—tools that work for people, not profits.

Alternatives like Mastodon and Bluesky (Definitely not threads though) are gaining momentum, but scaling decentralized platforms without replicating old problems is a tough challenge. Regulation and public ownership are key.

Twitter’s push to monetize reflects a broader problem: the privatization of the digital public square. Platforms meant to connect people are increasingly shaped by profit motives and political influence.

Trump’s re-election shows the power social media holds. Disinformation spread rapidly on Twitter, with algorithmic tweaks and relaxed moderation playing a key role in shaping public opinion.

Under Musk, Twitter has shifted its focus, favoring “free speech absolutism” that often amplifies harmful content. This has turned the platform into fertile ground for disinformation and divisive narratives.

Elon Musk’s takeover has accelerated its decline: mass layoffs, unbanning controversial figures, and turning verification into a paid status symbol have eroded trust and fractured the community.

Twitter was once a vital tool for activism and journalism, amplifying marginalized voices and breaking news. But it’s been gutted by corporate greed, poor moderation, and unchecked harassment.

Seems I can put #westham etc… not sure if I’m misunderstanding your post though