You ain't living if you don't got Mole Verde containers as cups

More rape allegations against Trump than professional transgender athletes btw

He's not explaining it away, it is absolutely unacceptable. However the blame falls on the Israeli government. Not "jews".

That kind of phrasing is what racists read and run with as justification for antisemitic means

The crime in question is jaywalking

My car is over 20 years old and runs just fine.

Dude we haven't been #1 in years😹

Death penalty

Well unfortunately you're missing a pretty crucial factor. You're assuming the current administration thinks before they act.

We certainly need stuff from Canada

Lumber especially. We have no reason to rip our national parks apart

Can't I just go pick it up…?😹

You're literally the ones with the power to do so

You can't claim to want more, care about children while simultaneously cutting programs that help lower income children be able to be housed, eat, and access medical care

Also 5k? Wtf is 5k gonna do lol, that's not enough to even get them to preschool age

Again, my point entirely isn't about demand determining price, it's about the third party factors (i.e private entities) having a part to play in housing inflation. I'm disputing your claim that the monopoly has full and total control which, while partially true, doesn't ignore third party factors.

At no point did I dispute that higher quantity results in lower demand meaning lower price. We've agreed on this the entire time. My point being that there is, in fact, an indirect market relationship between private entities buying up property and the monopoly uncharging

While all these houses get bought up by the private entities the demand is technically higher which then the monopoly you're referring to has it's "justifications" to gouge more price wise claiming lower quantity when really they're there, it's just sitting vacant on some millionaires possession

Non coordinating? Although I never said it had total control the idea of them not playing in conjunction is almost disingenuous

All the homes owned by these aren't all getting rented out, some sit idle but nonetheless are "off the market" making houses by technicality less available

If you're going to deliberately miss the point then there's no conversation to be had

It'd be almost counterintuitive to build more houses when the problem isn't the amount of houses

You build more houses, those same corporations and millionaires buy and rent them out making even more money to buy even more houses… and so on

Its lucrative sure, but detrimental on the lower class

Great question, here you go
news.ku.edu/news/article...