weedramatic.bsky.social
@weedramatic.bsky.social
Every new internal combustion engine is a policy failure.
eg
November 23, 2025 at 1:26 AM
the article is pretty clear that a common reason is lack of money
November 23, 2025 at 1:24 AM
do you just mean smiles or Whitmer and Shapiro saying the same things, about e.g. Gaza?
November 22, 2025 at 12:29 PM
True, but also one strong predictor of whites voting for Trump was an increase in non-whites moving to live nearby. Which reflects poorly on those voters.

I'm not familiar with VT or MA, but CT at least is very white and takes racist NIMBY measures to keep it that way.
November 16, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Related, a problem with the Mueller accountability idea is that he was a Republican who soft pedelled the investigation and a Republican AG watered down the summary even more. Democrats who want to win elections should not do that.
November 15, 2025 at 6:02 PM
"Bro do you even lift
up marginalized communities?"

I can think of not secret gym rats off the top of my head and they don't flaunt it because it'd be so silly
November 15, 2025 at 1:03 PM
The question isn't why the Exxon CEO goes, but why climate activists would jet there
"Most of Woods’ CEO peers in the oil and gas industry have stopped making the annual trip to climate summits, but Woods has become a veteran by now after trips COP28 in Dubai and COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan"
November 13, 2025 at 11:42 AM
People are going to be really confused by my newfound support for a highly educated mayor of South Bend for president.
November 12, 2025 at 1:02 PM
(not the dumbest part but)

if you destroy your optimus, you get two optimai(?) to stop you from doing crime. If you destroy two...
November 11, 2025 at 11:30 PM
I still need to find a bottle of your pfp, sigh
November 11, 2025 at 8:15 PM
yes for Lamar and Chotiner, but canonically not for JCO
November 11, 2025 at 8:08 PM
maybe the writer misunderstood "the first james bond movie, with daniel craig" and nobody ever corrected him
November 11, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Obviously schumer can't keep the caucus united. So when you unite, who should be the senate minority leader?
November 11, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Consumption has associated co2 emissions. Consumption directly by the government is different. But at a rough approximation, people receive and consume incomes, and wealthy people who earn and consume the most cause the most emissions. That's childbearing-agnostic choice.
November 10, 2025 at 5:34 PM
The existence of a baby does not cause co2 emissions. Other people choose to use resources on behalf of the baby, and hopefully that baby grows into an adult who decides to use some resources for themselves. I'm not telling people what to do. But those assumptions are misleading and simplistic.
November 10, 2025 at 5:34 PM