We're working on it.
Was the M, but now we could (or rather, should) do it with the L, I think.

Sounds like a good program. 😈

It's about risk assessment. You play in some way, you take some risk. Doesn't matter if it's about where you put the electrodes, what substances you take, or if you're tied up upside down.

It's the same process on how you evaluate, and mitigate the risks, even though the risks are not the same.

So far, I haven't heard of casualties from people using an estim device (or a shock collar) above the chest. Doesn't mean the risk doesn't exist, but it seems to be more of a theoretical risk.

Why not compare this to drugs/poppers, which carry a practical risk and are widely accepted? It's unfair?

I agree. I just wish that the risk assessment was based on observational evidence too.

After all, many knowledgeable players do poppers, or other chems. Known to be dangerous both in theory and in practice, and have some record of causing permanent disabilities and some fatalities.

My cardiologist friend said something different.

Fun activities often carry risks. It's about knowing them, how to mitigate them, and how to react if something happens.

In an inverted suspension, there are plenty of risks that shouldn't make you consider it safe in the first place, for example.

If I remember well, it was abs and pecs, yes. :)