washpa.bsky.social
washpa.bsky.social
@washpa.bsky.social
Why the hell are they all gathering so much info on us if they can't even get simple stuff like this right?
December 5, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Judge Oldham is not a skin suit of elderly rats yelling at clouds, he's a 46 year old human.

Apparently this belief has been adopted by fewer people than those that love him.
November 21, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Very true. Hopefully they know it would be obvious to the point it wouldn't be beneficial.
November 21, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Asking in general.

You know, like if a bunch of narcissistic sociopaths with walls closing in wanted to delete all of the files that exisy only on executive branch servers.

As one example.
November 21, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Is this more speed or incompetence in this case?

Because holy hell did they do this very badly.
November 21, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Honest question. Is there anything preventing someone who was motivated enough from deleting a shit ton of evidence in the federal systems?

I hope there's something.
November 21, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Judge Oldham is not a skin suit of elderly rats yelling at clouds, he's a 46 year old human.

Allegedly.
November 20, 2025 at 11:57 PM
104 pages? Of what seems to be a stream of consciousness diatribe. And calling out another judge by name repeatedly.

Amazing.
November 20, 2025 at 3:25 AM
IANAL, but is there any legal recourse from here?

I'm guessing competitive advantage isn't a valid protection if it's an unfair advantage.
November 19, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Yes, but public pressure is FREAKING out the politicians.

He seems like he's in invincible, he has been so far. But he's weak and the sharks smell blood in the water.

The internal struggle to fill the void is going to be wild.
November 19, 2025 at 4:39 AM
Who though?

Not Russia, they're tied into this, same with MOSSAD.

Maybe China?
November 19, 2025 at 4:21 AM
No no no. We have to push him. There is absolutely no reason he can't release the files at any time. Even if there is some policy they claim says he can't. The SC gave him immunity over official actions.
November 19, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Heck, he has immunity from the Supreme Court.

He can literally order it done at any time, maybe even by just thinking it.
November 19, 2025 at 4:08 AM
Don't be such a doomer. We've been burned so many times. But I think we've crested a wave.

It doesn't matter what desperate maneuvers he takes, he has the ability to release them at any time. He can just think about it. And the SC gave him immunity while doing official acts. He can release them.
November 19, 2025 at 4:03 AM
I fucking love it. He gave him the stiletto coming and going.
November 19, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The ONLY factor. Return shareholder value.
November 19, 2025 at 3:37 AM
🤮

I had to look it up to make sure it was authentic. The fucking disgusting black hearts of these people. Nominee for worst quote:

"From the vantage point of Mr. Epstein’s inbox, the revelations concerning the abusive behavior of men in power played out like a psychological thriller".
November 17, 2025 at 12:11 AM
The legal acrobatics of threading the needle between the irreparable harm of people starving vs. the harm that comes from the executive overspending, for what should be as short a period as possible are going to be hilariously disingenuous.
November 8, 2025 at 4:24 AM
From a legal perspective why do you think she feels that way?
November 8, 2025 at 3:40 AM