The amazing glam photo of Loomer demonstrates the pull of a profile in Conde Nast. Who cares about the article; we subscribe for the visual stimulation.

Right, that's what I think many will misunderstand. Giuliani remains in a heap of sub-federal legal trouble for an outrageous amount of stupidity even POTUS can't remediate.

This is a specific case because it's intelligence (spying): DHS's intel agency (Office of Intelligence & Analysis) requested the data. That's a no-no, as spying on US citizens isn't allowed per the Fourth Amendment. Counterintelligence (of US citizens) must be handled by FBI.

No, there are "preemptive pardons." See, eg, www.newsweek.com/preemptive-p...

I understand and agree on the "just mean," and that meanness is often the cheapest and easiest of tones. On the other hand, fashion and style are informed by and complement the body they ride. Body shape is relevant. Bullying people for height, however, just shows the world who's stunted.

On a visual medium, discussion of people's visual representations is fair game. Manners are tools of hegemony, and the feelings of insecure men especially don't interest me. I had practice enough managing during my salad/slut days.