Alex
banner
wallhax.bsky.social
Alex
@wallhax.bsky.social
Oops
This is usually a self-defeating position, at least in the long-run, because housing values for younger families correlate with schools - if your house is zoned for good schools, it is going to be more valuable than if not.
November 17, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Drone strikes on random boats
November 6, 2025 at 6:28 PM
we're going to wipe out basically every other species in the process, which is the actual issue here
October 28, 2025 at 3:23 AM
There is/was a lot of this going around in regards to fast fashion, especially SHEIN
October 1, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Isn't that a totally different point? We're discussing whether there is an institutional bias against a political candidate, which would be governed by by the way news and editorial coverage about him is directed. no one is arguing that the food or games sections are institutionally anti-mamdani.
July 8, 2025 at 2:04 AM
How is the number of employees relevant? Your argument can't be that the Times is incapable of making "institutional" decisions unless all 6k employees are in agreement.
July 8, 2025 at 1:58 AM
It’s still baffling to me that the liberal party in this country follows a strict hierarchy based almost exclusively on age and seniority, while the conservative party does not
May 21, 2025 at 6:19 PM
I doubt that carville would have been taking advice from people who worked for LBJ so I don’t really understand why anyone gives him the time of day at this point
April 17, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Some cops did their jobs on Jan. 6 and the rest of the department openly mocked them.

The underlying idea (use state apparatus to jam up federal overreach and protect your citizens is good), but you can’t just rely on cops to do that without careful vetting first

www.newsweek.com/former-jan-6...
Former Jan. 6 officer mocked by D.C. police at medal ceremony: "Disgrace"
On Tuesday, members of Congress honored police who responded to the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
www.newsweek.com
April 15, 2025 at 5:34 AM
this is true for all of the project 2025 stuff they're doing. they might still get away with it, but stretching it out over four years and boiling the frog would have made it a lot harder to bolster resistance
April 15, 2025 at 2:14 AM
This is how you get Benghazi investigations that seem to go nowhere but lead to the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server. Pull on every loose string you see until something starts to unravel (which is even easier here because everyone in the current admin is a moron).
March 26, 2025 at 1:28 PM
they fired walt harris for less. i assume they want andrew luck to make the decision because muir is resigning at the end of the year, but this is gross.
March 20, 2025 at 2:57 AM
There’s a mix of, I guess, trolling involved as well: anyone who has committed or been accused of certain offenses (violence, sexual or otherwise, against women, racism, antisemitism, etc.) is now presumed not only to be innocent of those allegations but worthy of elevation directly because of them
February 27, 2025 at 11:09 PM
i always understood that this was b/c AFA is in CO Springs, which is a super evangelical/mega church town
February 22, 2025 at 5:44 AM
Bove, watching Rudy lose his house: I want that for myself
February 14, 2025 at 7:51 PM
If you want to be one of the 100 most powerful people in the country, you should have to work hard. Plenty of people will do the job if they’re not up for it.
February 7, 2025 at 5:28 AM
Dante knew this in the 14th century!
February 6, 2025 at 7:06 PM
What they’re doing is literally illegal and you should say so rather than introducing some new meaningless legislation that won’t pass
February 4, 2025 at 8:45 PM
why are democrats still voting to confirm trump's cabinet picks? why there not total obstruction until musk has been removed from his illegitimate role as emperor of the united states?
February 4, 2025 at 7:25 PM
why won't you say that this is illegal and unconstitutional? you are framing it as if it is a policy choice, not a criminal effort to redirect necessary government funding (including potentially social security and medicare) to Elon Musk, personally.
February 4, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Dems have the ability to circumvent the media apparatus you’re describing by using social media to directly make any point that they want and Schumer is posting about tomatoes
February 3, 2025 at 4:31 AM
The democrats often behave as if they are in a college debate, where their well-tailored points will score points with impartial judges who decide the winners, rather than trying to convince people who are generally disinterested in politics to give a shit about what's happening
February 3, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Republicans never miss a chance to call something illegal or unconstitutional when a Democrat does it, but we somehow can’t find democrats who will even take that step here
February 2, 2025 at 8:05 PM
People absolutely will scream at you if you allow the other team to score an easy layup!
February 2, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Are these actions (reviewing sensitive government data without congressional permission, accessing classified materials without security clearance) crimes? Are they felonies? If so, why not say so?
February 2, 2025 at 7:56 PM