Looks like the latter, sadly.

They're the ones in my replies telling me I should sell out half a billion fellow citizens & vote for Jill Stein(who will never win) because of "morals." Unfortunately for them, my morals dictate that the good of the many far outweighs any qualms I may have over a single issue or stance here & there

I'm would never be so selfish as to put to put my personal morals before the needs of like half a billion other humans because I don't find that to be particularly moral at all. But you do you.

Jill Stein has been running for about 2 decades, at least, and can't even win a seat at the table. It doesn't matter how good of a person she is if she isn't in the room.

Slow rolling us to the same spot by establishing marriage equality, fighting to maintain reproductive choice, gender affirming care, and mental wellness initiatives? That's the same as bastardized Bible themed authoritarianism? You make no sense.

Then you vote for everyone to suffer for your "morals" which makes you no better than the theocrats. 🤷‍♀️ Enjoy the smog up in your ivory tower. Like, your protest vote also stops the more green than blues in congress from moving your goals forward. But 😱🤜🦪🦪 heaven forbid.

IDK. Are you a cunt, or just a bitch? "ooo, this is why dems lose". Put forward someone more that HALF OF ONE PERCENT people would actually consider voting for or STFU.

Wompwompwompwompwomp is all I hear. Enjoy sitting all "leftier than thou" on your high horse. I don't see the greens winning much of anything. Maybe the candidates should being...better at politics. Because nothing makes me want to give someone my vote like them openly looking down their nose at me.

Then, at least we'd not be living in constant chaos, intentional distraction, fascist hell. Was she perfect? No. But for damn sure she was better than whatever the fuck we have now.

Thanks for the school newspaper essay. Apparently, you should go back to relearn maths since that's what I was speaking of and specifically said in my post. Were there other factors preventing a huge win? Yes. But MATHEMATICALLY, with all the 3rd party votes, she'd have won.

I mean, technically, had that "miniscule amount of 3rd party voters" voted for her...it actually was enough to put her over the top. So in this single instance, mathematically, yes it was/is a problem. And now it's all of our problem.

Equal opportunity measures, by their very nature, cannot be in opposition to anti-discrimination laws because Equal opportunity IS anti-discrimination.

MASA is...a choice.

Rufkm?

Harassment is a crime.

sites.harvard.edu/ethan-shaotr...

That's rich. "You have committed a crime by outing my pet criminals."

Well, then they definitely have no business there and are actively committing treason. Enough playing around. They need to be taken out. Period. Military personnel sitting back and letting this happen are also in violation of their oaths. Are all in our armed forces are willing to be complicit?

It would be a fine time to accidentally trip or pull something that knocks all his satellites offline. One would assume that the unauthorized external drives being hooked to the gov systems are connected to starlink, right? Shut it down. At every starlink hub. Everywhere.