3: sue Fox & its heirs for every penny they have earned (even nonliquid pennies) on behalf of every people whom they have harmed, including Americans in general, & redistribute their wealth worldwide, but with varied reparations added on for many particularly misportrayed & spoken-over demographics.

If we win the battle against both deception & censorship, then we win overall, even if it takes a while. This is why I always say that we need to

1: put factchecks over social media posts instead of removing them,

2: prevent bots overrunning the web too much for us to do this, &

My libby account is not cooperating, but I eagerly await these book recommendations.

The part for which I have no *instantly applicable* solution is how their unfactful pundits spin nonviolent defense against the people doing it who challenge violent systems which the pundits wholeheartedly defend.

Unfazedly & reasonably protecting one another's reasonably unfazed boundaries

is empathetically circumspect.

"Empathetically circumspect"

is just longhand for "loving". ....

protective

citizens arrest

violent oppressors

even in uniform

humanely minimizing harm

*.no ~.FRILLY.~ violence.*

no matter how earned

FORGIVE

let live

love radically
hope
deprogram
redeem

as legal as legalistically "nonviolent resistance"

Negligent bystander *legislation* would fail to accomodate less competent assessors & responders,

plus WOULD be coopted to legally justify moral injustices.

Especially in a world of encarceration, initiative is less violent than legislative delegation.

Courageous examples transform better anyway.

Conflating nonviolence with enablement is a grave mistake.

Without wise boundaries, compassion excludes not only one's self but many others for whose safety one is responsible.

Sustainable safety requires empowerment.

Accessible empowerment demands community.

bsky.app/profile/vuln...

We must balance - & juggle - seamstressly continuing teamwork with upholding our boundaries.

Folk must do this in intentional communities, but most others don't grasp it, when cancel culture becomes gatekeeping.

Not playing by rules requires organizing in privacy.

Many of us can't/won't trust diversely skilled enough people within physical reach,

or aren't relationally well enough to be mutually good for one another at length.

Where does utilitarian foresight require nuance from virtue & duty?

When duty & virtue are makeup for cowardice & comfort-seeking, we must redefine beauty as the truth we live when we fully face collective needs.

Duty is just doodee when gritty insight reveals our sincerity to be MIA.

.. Ew.

Muck rake each of our own stubborn fantasies.

Stake mid-victorian horror for making revolution fake, again.

Bleach is no cure for bloodstaining, *especially* on any Sunday.

End bleach ethics.

💟✊🏻💗

A minimum percentage of bonus should be to distribute to one another's anonymous causes as one chooses-

with spending accountability.

In a large company, the funds should be searchable by topic, urgency, & distance to meaningful goal-attainment, with visual distributions of ask types & so forth.

The company should have to distribute all its wealth regularly to employees & to voted upon company growths & philanthropies.

I also believe that within the same company no one should make more than maybe 1.7ish× what anyone else does,

& that all companies should be owned by all coworkers within them,

- shares proportionate to total time contribution, but expiring maybe 2-4 years after one has worked there, to speak of.