Not Again
@vortex3.bsky.social
Trying to tune out the next 4 years. Mostly failing.
From what I read a long time ago, he had enormous cost overruns during construction (sheer incompetence), which forced him to borrow huge amounts with high interest rates to complete construction. Bad management coupled with crushing interest payments made the whole thing implode.
#ETTD.
#ETTD.
November 20, 2025 at 4:49 AM
From what I read a long time ago, he had enormous cost overruns during construction (sheer incompetence), which forced him to borrow huge amounts with high interest rates to complete construction. Bad management coupled with crushing interest payments made the whole thing implode.
#ETTD.
#ETTD.
I was expecting a goofy "woke tried to kill me" hoax, but this is disturbing, she disfigured herself for this.
And there was a co-conspirator? Two people decided this was a good idea?
And there was a co-conspirator? Two people decided this was a good idea?
November 20, 2025 at 2:45 AM
I was expecting a goofy "woke tried to kill me" hoax, but this is disturbing, she disfigured herself for this.
And there was a co-conspirator? Two people decided this was a good idea?
And there was a co-conspirator? Two people decided this was a good idea?
At the behest of a game show host whose most famous accomplishment was losing billions to bankrupt casinos.
November 20, 2025 at 2:25 AM
At the behest of a game show host whose most famous accomplishment was losing billions to bankrupt casinos.
Right. Same idea, different whackadoodle.
November 20, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Right. Same idea, different whackadoodle.
I don't know, everybody wants to downplay this. But I don't think he would have been pressuring MTG in the Situation Room if he wasn't worried about it.
November 20, 2025 at 1:41 AM
I don't know, everybody wants to downplay this. But I don't think he would have been pressuring MTG in the Situation Room if he wasn't worried about it.
Oh no, they support *voting rights*?
Truly despicable, obviously nothing they say can have merit.
Truly despicable, obviously nothing they say can have merit.
November 19, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Oh no, they support *voting rights*?
Truly despicable, obviously nothing they say can have merit.
Truly despicable, obviously nothing they say can have merit.
As for me, I say put her in charge of everything on Trump's vengeance tour.
You're doing great Lindsey, don't let these naysayers get you down. You'll get 'em next time.
You're doing great Lindsey, don't let these naysayers get you down. You'll get 'em next time.
November 19, 2025 at 8:15 PM
As for me, I say put her in charge of everything on Trump's vengeance tour.
You're doing great Lindsey, don't let these naysayers get you down. You'll get 'em next time.
You're doing great Lindsey, don't let these naysayers get you down. You'll get 'em next time.
Of course.
I'm also not going to complain if Trump puts totally unqualified keystone cops in charge of his plans for fundamentally dishonest vengeance.
I'm also not going to complain if Trump puts totally unqualified keystone cops in charge of his plans for fundamentally dishonest vengeance.
November 19, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Of course.
I'm also not going to complain if Trump puts totally unqualified keystone cops in charge of his plans for fundamentally dishonest vengeance.
I'm also not going to complain if Trump puts totally unqualified keystone cops in charge of his plans for fundamentally dishonest vengeance.
Why does the GJ vote on counts individually, if the indictment only goes forward in its entirety or not at all?
The most likely scenario IMO is that Halligan simply didn't know this, and thought they could bring forward the charges that were indicted and remove the charge that wasn't.
The most likely scenario IMO is that Halligan simply didn't know this, and thought they could bring forward the charges that were indicted and remove the charge that wasn't.
November 19, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Why does the GJ vote on counts individually, if the indictment only goes forward in its entirety or not at all?
The most likely scenario IMO is that Halligan simply didn't know this, and thought they could bring forward the charges that were indicted and remove the charge that wasn't.
The most likely scenario IMO is that Halligan simply didn't know this, and thought they could bring forward the charges that were indicted and remove the charge that wasn't.
The Principle that the law doesn't apply to Senators?
November 19, 2025 at 6:53 PM
The Principle that the law doesn't apply to Senators?
Of course he's jealous of having the power of making journalists leave this world in the form of mincemeat.
I don't mean that as some kind of insult or metaphor. I think he would genuinely like to be able to get away with that.
I don't mean that as some kind of insult or metaphor. I think he would genuinely like to be able to get away with that.
November 18, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Of course he's jealous of having the power of making journalists leave this world in the form of mincemeat.
I don't mean that as some kind of insult or metaphor. I think he would genuinely like to be able to get away with that.
I don't mean that as some kind of insult or metaphor. I think he would genuinely like to be able to get away with that.
I am beginning to think Trump picked her because of her looks and loyalty and not for her professionalism.
November 18, 2025 at 9:44 PM
I am beginning to think Trump picked her because of her looks and loyalty and not for her professionalism.
I don't really find it hard to follow. He got on the Epstein train because he believed it would win him votes, and the alternative was going to prison.
Once in power, he was sure he could cover it up, like he's covered up everything else. And most likely, he still will.
Once in power, he was sure he could cover it up, like he's covered up everything else. And most likely, he still will.
November 18, 2025 at 7:54 PM
I don't really find it hard to follow. He got on the Epstein train because he believed it would win him votes, and the alternative was going to prison.
Once in power, he was sure he could cover it up, like he's covered up everything else. And most likely, he still will.
Once in power, he was sure he could cover it up, like he's covered up everything else. And most likely, he still will.
You can't get blood from a stone.
November 18, 2025 at 2:35 PM
You can't get blood from a stone.
One of my biggest disappointments in life is that I'll never see this guy get slapped across the face.
November 18, 2025 at 2:02 AM
One of my biggest disappointments in life is that I'll never see this guy get slapped across the face.
Look how gleeful he is about it.
November 17, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Look how gleeful he is about it.
He has assurances that nothing damaging will be released. IMO.
November 17, 2025 at 6:36 AM
He has assurances that nothing damaging will be released. IMO.
"whatever they are legally entitled to" is the catch.
November 17, 2025 at 2:27 AM
"whatever they are legally entitled to" is the catch.
This is a corollary to Trump's "you can't indict somebody with my polls" absolute madness.
November 17, 2025 at 1:25 AM
This is a corollary to Trump's "you can't indict somebody with my polls" absolute madness.