(((woland))) 🇺🇲✡️🇺🇦
@voland66.bsky.social
Ukraine-born Russian-speaking Jewish-American non-believer, physicist, and educator
Trump is scared of the Democrats who urge the troops to refuse illegal order, so he calls for their execution and incites violence against them. Trump is not scared of Mamdani, so he praises him.
November 22, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Trump is scared of the Democrats who urge the troops to refuse illegal order, so he calls for their execution and incites violence against them. Trump is not scared of Mamdani, so he praises him.
They have a chyron "Thanksgiving dinner costs drop" as she is saying beef prices went up by a factor of 5?
I am impressed by Fox's confidence in the illiteracy and innumeracy levels of their audience.
I am impressed by Fox's confidence in the illiteracy and innumeracy levels of their audience.
November 21, 2025 at 5:45 PM
They have a chyron "Thanksgiving dinner costs drop" as she is saying beef prices went up by a factor of 5?
I am impressed by Fox's confidence in the illiteracy and innumeracy levels of their audience.
I am impressed by Fox's confidence in the illiteracy and innumeracy levels of their audience.
But he is not just opposed to the settler movement. He is clearly opposed to the existence of a Jewish state. So this matches his values and his politics.
November 21, 2025 at 6:55 AM
But he is not just opposed to the settler movement. He is clearly opposed to the existence of a Jewish state. So this matches his values and his politics.
This proves that Sanders was right, as always, when he stood by his endorsement of Platner: Platner has nothing to apologize for since swastika is not a hate symbol.
</sarcasm>
</sarcasm>
November 20, 2025 at 7:51 PM
This proves that Sanders was right, as always, when he stood by his endorsement of Platner: Platner has nothing to apologize for since swastika is not a hate symbol.
</sarcasm>
</sarcasm>
Yes, and you chose your fighters: Nazi lovers.
Unfortunately for you, most Democrats will choose better fighters.
Unfortunately for you, most Democrats will choose better fighters.
November 20, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Yes, and you chose your fighters: Nazi lovers.
Unfortunately for you, most Democrats will choose better fighters.
Unfortunately for you, most Democrats will choose better fighters.
I'll make it clear for you:
Sanders was in the office for 35 years. While in office his biggest legislative achievements is naming a few post offices. This year he distinguished himself by endorsing a Nazi-loving misogynistic homophobet.
So why don't you start your primary challenges with Sanders?
Sanders was in the office for 35 years. While in office his biggest legislative achievements is naming a few post offices. This year he distinguished himself by endorsing a Nazi-loving misogynistic homophobet.
So why don't you start your primary challenges with Sanders?
November 20, 2025 at 4:52 AM
I'll make it clear for you:
Sanders was in the office for 35 years. While in office his biggest legislative achievements is naming a few post offices. This year he distinguished himself by endorsing a Nazi-loving misogynistic homophobet.
So why don't you start your primary challenges with Sanders?
Sanders was in the office for 35 years. While in office his biggest legislative achievements is naming a few post offices. This year he distinguished himself by endorsing a Nazi-loving misogynistic homophobet.
So why don't you start your primary challenges with Sanders?
Why don't you start with Sanders? Or do you like the Senators who endorse Nazi lovers?
November 20, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Why don't you start with Sanders? Or do you like the Senators who endorse Nazi lovers?
You can say no as often as you want. You are in a cult of enablers. You are both lying and enabling fascism.
November 20, 2025 at 4:35 AM
You can say no as often as you want. You are in a cult of enablers. You are both lying and enabling fascism.
"If I wanted to be in a cult, I would have joined MAGA".
You are a in a cult. The cult at the other end of a horseshoe.
You are a in a cult. The cult at the other end of a horseshoe.
November 20, 2025 at 4:30 AM
"If I wanted to be in a cult, I would have joined MAGA".
You are a in a cult. The cult at the other end of a horseshoe.
You are a in a cult. The cult at the other end of a horseshoe.
Sure, who needs money and volunteers to flip Republican districts & states. Let's instead spend all our funds & efforts on challenging sitting Democrats in primaries.
(And while one may wonder what would happen to Schumer in a primary, challenging Jeffries is a waste of money at best)
(And while one may wonder what would happen to Schumer in a primary, challenging Jeffries is a waste of money at best)
November 20, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Sure, who needs money and volunteers to flip Republican districts & states. Let's instead spend all our funds & efforts on challenging sitting Democrats in primaries.
(And while one may wonder what would happen to Schumer in a primary, challenging Jeffries is a waste of money at best)
(And while one may wonder what would happen to Schumer in a primary, challenging Jeffries is a waste of money at best)
Or maybe the left should stop supporting bigots and Nazi lovers before the difference between the two parties disappears. But clearly you don't care about democracy, you only care that the corrupt bigots in power are corrupt bigots you approve of.
Bye
Bye
November 19, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Or maybe the left should stop supporting bigots and Nazi lovers before the difference between the two parties disappears. But clearly you don't care about democracy, you only care that the corrupt bigots in power are corrupt bigots you approve of.
Bye
Bye
If allegiance to a party is your metric than you are no different from MAGA.
When she attacks corrupt members of her party, she is to be commended. And Sanders, who often attacks members of his party (actually, the party he refuses to call his) while promoting Nazi-lovers, is to be shunned.
When she attacks corrupt members of her party, she is to be commended. And Sanders, who often attacks members of his party (actually, the party he refuses to call his) while promoting Nazi-lovers, is to be shunned.
November 19, 2025 at 1:17 AM
If allegiance to a party is your metric than you are no different from MAGA.
When she attacks corrupt members of her party, she is to be commended. And Sanders, who often attacks members of his party (actually, the party he refuses to call his) while promoting Nazi-lovers, is to be shunned.
When she attacks corrupt members of her party, she is to be commended. And Sanders, who often attacks members of his party (actually, the party he refuses to call his) while promoting Nazi-lovers, is to be shunned.
I do not have an allegiance to a party. No one should have an allegiance to the party. My allegiance is to a set of principles.
By trying to keep the party free from bigotry & corruption Perez helps make the Democratic party worthy of my support. Tlaib & Sanders? - not so much.
By trying to keep the party free from bigotry & corruption Perez helps make the Democratic party worthy of my support. Tlaib & Sanders? - not so much.
November 18, 2025 at 11:10 PM
I do not have an allegiance to a party. No one should have an allegiance to the party. My allegiance is to a set of principles.
By trying to keep the party free from bigotry & corruption Perez helps make the Democratic party worthy of my support. Tlaib & Sanders? - not so much.
By trying to keep the party free from bigotry & corruption Perez helps make the Democratic party worthy of my support. Tlaib & Sanders? - not so much.
CA gerrymander was not race-based (not to mention that unlike TX it was voter approved and, in a way, simply reverted CA constitution to the status quo 15 years ago), so is there a chance that TX gerrymander dies in court while CA one survives?
November 18, 2025 at 7:20 PM
CA gerrymander was not race-based (not to mention that unlike TX it was voter approved and, in a way, simply reverted CA constitution to the status quo 15 years ago), so is there a chance that TX gerrymander dies in court while CA one survives?
Yes, she attacks bigoted and corrupt politicians in her party. That gives me another reason to support her party. That should give any patriotic American a reason to support her party.
November 18, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Yes, she attacks bigoted and corrupt politicians in her party. That gives me another reason to support her party. That should give any patriotic American a reason to support her party.
I will take someone who attacks bigotry and corruption in their own party over someone who endorses a homophobic and misogynistic Nazi lover. I will do that every single time. I understand that you have different principles.
Bye
Bye
November 18, 2025 at 6:07 PM
I will take someone who attacks bigotry and corruption in their own party over someone who endorses a homophobic and misogynistic Nazi lover. I will do that every single time. I understand that you have different principles.
Bye
Bye
You are almost right: he didn't attack "other Democrats", he attacked the Democratic party and some of its most reliable constituencies. Given that Sanders is not a Democrat but rather someone trying to hijack the Democratic party, this is not surprising, is it?
November 18, 2025 at 5:55 PM
You are almost right: he didn't attack "other Democrats", he attacked the Democratic party and some of its most reliable constituencies. Given that Sanders is not a Democrat but rather someone trying to hijack the Democratic party, this is not surprising, is it?
Let's start with Sanders reaffirming his endorsement of a homophobic misogynist with a Nazi tattoo. Oh, I forgot, this is the coalition you want!
November 18, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Let's start with Sanders reaffirming his endorsement of a homophobic misogynist with a Nazi tattoo. Oh, I forgot, this is the coalition you want!
It depends on how you define the coalition. I would say that Tlaib, Sanders, and a few others, are the ones causing much more division.
November 18, 2025 at 5:40 PM
It depends on how you define the coalition. I would say that Tlaib, Sanders, and a few others, are the ones causing much more division.
Asking as a non-lawyer: if one of three counts is no-billed, do they need to have a vote on a new two count indictment or can they use the existing vote for the remaining two counts if they document things properly?
November 17, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Asking as a non-lawyer: if one of three counts is no-billed, do they need to have a vote on a new two count indictment or can they use the existing vote for the remaining two counts if they document things properly?
Should not we know the criminal history of a person before we claim that person has criminal history?
November 17, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Should not we know the criminal history of a person before we claim that person has criminal history?
Trump told them to vote for the release of files because he knew most of them will. As someone pointed out:
Refusing to sign the discharge petition is one thing, openly voting to protect pedophiles is a totally different thing. Most of them are too scared to do the latter even for Trump.
Refusing to sign the discharge petition is one thing, openly voting to protect pedophiles is a totally different thing. Most of them are too scared to do the latter even for Trump.
November 17, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Trump told them to vote for the release of files because he knew most of them will. As someone pointed out:
Refusing to sign the discharge petition is one thing, openly voting to protect pedophiles is a totally different thing. Most of them are too scared to do the latter even for Trump.
Refusing to sign the discharge petition is one thing, openly voting to protect pedophiles is a totally different thing. Most of them are too scared to do the latter even for Trump.
I don't think there is a plan to issue "dividends" before the election. They just think that to continue lying about this they to have provide a vague date in not so distant future.
November 17, 2025 at 8:54 PM
I don't think there is a plan to issue "dividends" before the election. They just think that to continue lying about this they to have provide a vague date in not so distant future.