Now, let’s apply a parallel logic to that used by Reform concerning immigration:

…but a few are criminals, so we can’t trust any immigrant.

Please speak up in Parliament. Do it often. Challenge the govt’s trans-harming policies. Speak for us where we have no access. You’re in a position to do that. Trans people aren’t. This is the solidarity we need. Insist on trans people being included in decisions that affect our lives. Thank you.

And colourful, interesting, entertaining, intelligent, aware, beautiful, rich, liked…

Toby Buckle sums up this style of “reactionary centrist”, factless, appeasement politics really well here.

podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/p...

Additionally, where organisations implemented changes in good faith (I’m being generous here), could not those orgs seek costs from those in the EHRC who created this illegal situation?

Sadly, I think you are correct.

This has been the dark cloud engulfing me since reading Jess’s summary of SM’s ville intervention.

I can’t not feel their hatred however hard I try.

Happy Birthday Jess. Here’s hoping the outcome befits the occasion, gifting you for all the amazing work done by you and the team! 💝

Thank you 💕

Then there’s this:
“…reporting critically on the clinical and evidence-based aspects of gender medicine… a collaborative effort involving colleagues including Hannah Barnes, Emily Maitlis and Esme Wren” 🤦‍♀️

Deborah Cohen is trying to argue there was no bias. Erm…

www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...

…but no surprise. 🙄

Seriously, what there hell would we do without you. So good to read your précis of proceedings. Thank you! 💖