I can concede that sometimes its ambiguity can be a bit much at points but there are numerous great layers by which it details familial detachment, the civil war, influences of cinema on a child psyche into other aspects of life, growing up but in a way grieving.

yeah that i unfortunately know bc i've seen a pic

so is it nick's dick (fuck it rhymes)?

look there are way too many things going on in my head at this moment and so the very last thing i needed to know about is that weird looking goblin man Destiny apparently sucking dick.

It is both one of the great success of 2010s television but also a lesson on how success in certain contexts creates a stress to produce new material even if it doesn't have a solid vision or connective tissue. By becoming more of a spectacle, the show in my view lost its key virtues by the end.

sympathies for your loss, may she rest in peace.

That's the lesson to take: laughing at them will make more cringe, be kind so that the cringe lessons. Amen.

*seasons before 6*

see the weird with me is i know the seasons 6 before are not 1 to 1 adaptations and have their own changes and excises but there was enough meat to allow for its own identity away from the books to come forth. Again there's lately been little detail for me which is why I love the early seasons.

oh yeah i haven't read the books yet (will after i finish) but Dorne got really fucked over. With 6 I am questionable with the revive bc I don't think it was well explored emotionally and Dany in season 6 was at her most uninteresting to me and it just feels way too loose and ill-defined for me.

Honestly I wasn't even that much of a fan of 6 myself, though i did like the second half. I will agree that as spectacle it is pretty grand as television goes, but that's not why I loved The first four seasons of Game of Thrones (I like 5), it was grounded and detailed with the build to epic scale.