At least in the case of Elon, it seems like there's not enough risk in loaning money out to him. He kind of has an infinite money glitch going right now. There must be some hypothetical legislative solution that could fix or cap those kinds of bets.

I don't have a specific solution, but that seems like something worth trying to fix with new laws.

Maybe refunding could make sense even? It'd be like saying "we sized up your future value, but it was wrong, so nevermind". Or require the banks to address a portion of taxes on those kinds of loans?

The most egregious thing that comes to mind is Elon and TSLA: when he takes out new loans against the value of his stock, to then use on new ventures that seem to ultimately end up driving the hype around TSLA further. That's an asymmetry between how the banks and government value his future worth.

"scrambled at [his] feet" is WILD

Surely, everyone has a line somewhere. If you think there should be billionaires, do you think that there should be trillionaires? What about quadrillionaires? and so on

For most Wii devs, this should be enough to comply with the RTEMS licensing right? Like, whether the libogc maintainers end up acknowledging it or not, the full license disclosure is still on the end developer.

What happened to their algo being open? 🧐

Or, it helps to prevent impersonation by allowing trusted verifiers to identify who is and isn't legit.

Specifically, this will prevent buying a phishing-looking domain and trying to pass yourself off as a legitimate source of news.

In which way is it not an endorsement?