@verbaluce.bsky.social
I endeavor not to be strident.
Thanks for any follows.
Thanks for any follows.
With Musk, I think the knee pad goes to Trump.
January 18, 2025 at 2:27 PM
With Musk, I think the knee pad goes to Trump.
Aside from how he decided to commit mass murder, there is little here that separates Jabbar’s decent for Timothy McVeigh’s.
It is a homegrown American story.
It is a homegrown American story.
January 4, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Aside from how he decided to commit mass murder, there is little here that separates Jabbar’s decent for Timothy McVeigh’s.
It is a homegrown American story.
It is a homegrown American story.
Yes, most terrorism here is right wing inspired.
But I still wanna know what ideology radicalized this American, and how he came to it.
But I still wanna know what ideology radicalized this American, and how he came to it.
January 2, 2025 at 12:42 PM
Yes, most terrorism here is right wing inspired.
But I still wanna know what ideology radicalized this American, and how he came to it.
But I still wanna know what ideology radicalized this American, and how he came to it.
Yes, but also,
McKenzie Scott’s ex should get out of the newspaper biz.
McKenzie Scott’s ex should get out of the newspaper biz.
January 1, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Yes, but also,
McKenzie Scott’s ex should get out of the newspaper biz.
McKenzie Scott’s ex should get out of the newspaper biz.
Shit.
Gaetz has begun his vengeance.
Gaetz has begun his vengeance.
January 1, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Shit.
Gaetz has begun his vengeance.
Gaetz has begun his vengeance.
I have no idea what went on here and I am going to do my best to remain fully unaware.
January 1, 2025 at 2:15 PM
I have no idea what went on here and I am going to do my best to remain fully unaware.
There just no way you wrote that.
December 19, 2024 at 8:20 PM
There just no way you wrote that.
Respectfully,
and I’m sure it’s very good, not sure ‘instant’ fits for something that is primarily fueled by a 1939 film that left generations in wonder.
Just saying…kind of any easy lift?
and I’m sure it’s very good, not sure ‘instant’ fits for something that is primarily fueled by a 1939 film that left generations in wonder.
Just saying…kind of any easy lift?
December 19, 2024 at 8:14 PM
Respectfully,
and I’m sure it’s very good, not sure ‘instant’ fits for something that is primarily fueled by a 1939 film that left generations in wonder.
Just saying…kind of any easy lift?
and I’m sure it’s very good, not sure ‘instant’ fits for something that is primarily fueled by a 1939 film that left generations in wonder.
Just saying…kind of any easy lift?
I think it might be great if the self-appointed arbiters of serious thinking were purged.
But then again, we need the unserious and strident blowhard block fever crowd here to add contrast.
But then again, we need the unserious and strident blowhard block fever crowd here to add contrast.
December 19, 2024 at 11:55 AM
I think it might be great if the self-appointed arbiters of serious thinking were purged.
But then again, we need the unserious and strident blowhard block fever crowd here to add contrast.
But then again, we need the unserious and strident blowhard block fever crowd here to add contrast.
That’s pretty strident for @kevinmkruse.bsky.social.
Not sure why folks can’t just disagree with/challenge some of your takes in good faith.
I know I have directly on occasion, and I don’t recall any harrassment because of it.
Unless it was very, very subtle.
Not sure why folks can’t just disagree with/challenge some of your takes in good faith.
I know I have directly on occasion, and I don’t recall any harrassment because of it.
Unless it was very, very subtle.
December 19, 2024 at 11:48 AM
That’s pretty strident for @kevinmkruse.bsky.social.
Not sure why folks can’t just disagree with/challenge some of your takes in good faith.
I know I have directly on occasion, and I don’t recall any harrassment because of it.
Unless it was very, very subtle.
Not sure why folks can’t just disagree with/challenge some of your takes in good faith.
I know I have directly on occasion, and I don’t recall any harrassment because of it.
Unless it was very, very subtle.
Best not to post paywall links.
December 17, 2024 at 12:45 PM
Best not to post paywall links.
It’s wild to see ConsTwitter smirk and celebrate this. The ‘media bias’ set fully embracing paying tribute to a mobster.
I’m not feeling great about where we’re at.
I’m not feeling great about where we’re at.
December 17, 2024 at 12:06 PM
It’s wild to see ConsTwitter smirk and celebrate this. The ‘media bias’ set fully embracing paying tribute to a mobster.
I’m not feeling great about where we’re at.
I’m not feeling great about where we’re at.
🎵
Well…
We’re just another drone out of Boston
🎸
Well…
We’re just another drone out of Boston
🎸
December 16, 2024 at 1:24 AM
🎵
Well…
We’re just another drone out of Boston
🎸
Well…
We’re just another drone out of Boston
🎸
I think you sorta burned the ‘hey, I have a thoughtful point to make’ by being strident and too clever.
Yes, for profit healthcare is bad.
But let others handle this.
Yes, for profit healthcare is bad.
But let others handle this.
December 16, 2024 at 1:23 AM
I think you sorta burned the ‘hey, I have a thoughtful point to make’ by being strident and too clever.
Yes, for profit healthcare is bad.
But let others handle this.
Yes, for profit healthcare is bad.
But let others handle this.
Here or the other site doing a better job of making this stuff be/feel unwelcome?
December 16, 2024 at 1:20 AM
Here or the other site doing a better job of making this stuff be/feel unwelcome?
I do that, but inverted.
And walk not run.
And walk not run.
December 15, 2024 at 2:01 PM
I do that, but inverted.
And walk not run.
And walk not run.
Only speak on your phones if using Ubbi Dubbi.
December 13, 2024 at 3:43 AM
Only speak on your phones if using Ubbi Dubbi.
I mean, Andreesen was claiming that banks were blocking people because of they were on the political right/conservative.
How does that make sense at all?
How long does Andreesen feel banks have been lefty agitators?
How does that make sense at all?
How long does Andreesen feel banks have been lefty agitators?
December 11, 2024 at 3:41 AM
I mean, Andreesen was claiming that banks were blocking people because of they were on the political right/conservative.
How does that make sense at all?
How long does Andreesen feel banks have been lefty agitators?
How does that make sense at all?
How long does Andreesen feel banks have been lefty agitators?
I may follow you twice.
December 11, 2024 at 3:38 AM
I may follow you twice.
No biggie.
Just find the first name thing odd.
Reporters were not going with ‘Lee’ after JFK shot.
Just find the first name thing odd.
Reporters were not going with ‘Lee’ after JFK shot.
December 11, 2024 at 3:31 AM
No biggie.
Just find the first name thing odd.
Reporters were not going with ‘Lee’ after JFK shot.
Just find the first name thing odd.
Reporters were not going with ‘Lee’ after JFK shot.
Have either of the Naiomi’s weighed in yet?
December 10, 2024 at 12:50 PM
Have either of the Naiomi’s weighed in yet?
If I can be more nuanced…
Murder is to be condemned and this perp should face justice.
But clearly the reaction to this event reveals that the crowd is there for him if he starts shouting ‘Attica, Attica!’
We shouldn’t ignore or dismiss that.
Murder is to be condemned and this perp should face justice.
But clearly the reaction to this event reveals that the crowd is there for him if he starts shouting ‘Attica, Attica!’
We shouldn’t ignore or dismiss that.
December 10, 2024 at 12:27 PM
If I can be more nuanced…
Murder is to be condemned and this perp should face justice.
But clearly the reaction to this event reveals that the crowd is there for him if he starts shouting ‘Attica, Attica!’
We shouldn’t ignore or dismiss that.
Murder is to be condemned and this perp should face justice.
But clearly the reaction to this event reveals that the crowd is there for him if he starts shouting ‘Attica, Attica!’
We shouldn’t ignore or dismiss that.
Why not 100 justices…two for each state.
And 435 clerks.
Maybe there’s one person in an exec role who can have the power to veto some decisions.
And 435 clerks.
Maybe there’s one person in an exec role who can have the power to veto some decisions.
December 10, 2024 at 12:22 PM
Why not 100 justices…two for each state.
And 435 clerks.
Maybe there’s one person in an exec role who can have the power to veto some decisions.
And 435 clerks.
Maybe there’s one person in an exec role who can have the power to veto some decisions.