Neil Champagne
velishmal.bsky.social
Neil Champagne
@velishmal.bsky.social
Unapologetic Star Wars nerd. I love them ALL.
Sorry, daddy, I've been naughty.
November 14, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Hey folks? This thread is proof that there's at least some hope for salvaging our system! Thank you both for listening to each other, and finding common ground!
October 3, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Why call me a "stupid fucking shithead"? I agree those are all problems that need to be dealt with, but had jack shit to do with the original post. Sorry I wanted to stay on topic, now kindly get the fuck off my feed.
August 27, 2025 at 3:53 AM
I think I'm arguing with people defending pedophiles. Fuck political affiliations.
August 27, 2025 at 3:48 AM
You're the one who brought liberals into this. It's only natural that their foil would come up. In reality, my only argument here was that "pedophiles are shit". You're the one who made it political by slapping the liberal label on it. Get over yourself and make a point already. We're waiting.
August 27, 2025 at 3:46 AM
And if Conservatives had any compassion, they wouldn't have voted for a dictator who is actively seeking to strip the rights of American citizens.
August 27, 2025 at 3:40 AM
Whatever, lol. I'm not going to lower and debase myself so much as to hurl personal insults. It's just not worth my time. Pedophiles deserve prison time, and the fact that this is a political discussion is nothing short of fucking disgusting. Good day.
August 27, 2025 at 3:35 AM
Our own thoughts that pedophiles deserve prison sentences? Are you arguing something to the contrary?
August 27, 2025 at 3:30 AM
It's really not. If there's a person on that list, regardless of political affiliation, they should be locked up.
August 27, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Did you think that was going to be a debate? Anyone listed in the epstein files should be locked up. Period.
August 26, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Yeah, I refuse to bring children into this shit heap of a society.
August 13, 2025 at 1:09 AM
Yes, because she's advocating for making people feel uncomfortable and unsafe. That is objectively evil. She's promoting a culture of fear and hatred around something she doesn't understand, against a group of people who have done nothing wrong.
August 11, 2025 at 10:52 AM
Because she's a bigot who supports bigoted organizations. Being a bigot and a good person, as it turns out, are mutually exclusive. If an entire group of people look at you and feel like they wouldn't feel safe or comfortable in a room with you, you might be a bad person.
August 11, 2025 at 10:46 AM
Because he is cherry-picking what does and doesn't matter, at a guess. But I also think that's your point🤣
August 11, 2025 at 10:24 AM
I'm not going to lie. All I really know are two things:

1. "Life...uh...finds a way"
2. I refuse to let myself hate or fear that which I don't understand.
August 11, 2025 at 10:23 AM
The presence of Bigotry is something that can be proven by actions without meeting a person. If someone burns a cross on a person's front lawn, I don't need to meet that person to know they're a bigot. If someone wants to force a woman to use the men's room, I don't need to meet them.
August 11, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Oh, for sure! Sex and gender are far complicated than any of us truly understand.
August 11, 2025 at 9:54 AM
Because Elongated Muskrat isn't a scientist?
August 11, 2025 at 9:51 AM
Rowling is absolutely a hateful bigot. The fact that you don't want to be called one is funny as fuck. I would trust any trans person I know with my theoretical kids before I trust that walking pile of degenerate human refuse.
August 11, 2025 at 9:49 AM
"At will" is not the correct word choice here..."Per biological and reproductive need" would be more accurate. It's not like the fish wakes up, says "I'mma be a girl today", and presto. It takes energy to make that shift, so it's usually only done in cases of drastic imbalance of the sexes.
August 11, 2025 at 9:44 AM
To the potato!
July 8, 2025 at 5:25 PM
I wouldn't call those friends, or even acquaintances, so much as "people I occasionally share space, and have to maintain civility with", despite their cult actively wanting to erase me and mine.
June 23, 2025 at 6:55 PM
With this in mind, you can have something with an unreal amount of nudity, but with no intent to help anyone get off, and I would say it's not really porn. In the case of Nort, it's a slice of life comic, and occasional nudity is a part of life. That provides a sense of realism, more than anything.
June 23, 2025 at 6:46 PM
I feel like porn is more about the intent. If content is made specifically to help someone get off, then it's porn, regardless of the degree of nudity. If you make an 8 hour mouth noise reel, because you intend for people to get off to it, then you are both a monster, but also have made porn.
June 23, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Who's promoting their sexuality? There are a BUNCH of varying identities represented in the stories presented here. The messages contained in these books are about self-acceptance, self-love, and personal identity. You would know that if you took a second to read them.
June 21, 2025 at 4:07 PM