Things the big conservation corporations don't want you to know about them...
Formerly @vbadpanda on X
politi.co/43iUqA4
politi.co/43iUqA4
.@lufthansa.bsky.social reports 2 million people have been conned into buying its BS 'sustainable flying' premium - 90% spent on dodgy offsets, 10% on 'sustainable aviation fuel' (which isn't sustainable).
Under greenwash investigation by @ec.europa.eu, but not holding my breath.
bit.ly/3ZWZWGI
.@lufthansa.bsky.social reports 2 million people have been conned into buying its BS 'sustainable flying' premium - 90% spent on dodgy offsets, 10% on 'sustainable aviation fuel' (which isn't sustainable).
Under greenwash investigation by @ec.europa.eu, but not holding my breath.
bit.ly/3ZWZWGI
Excellent new documentary (available through VPN to Denmark) exposing IKEA's sourcing of wood from destroyed Romanian protected forests, the ongoing scandal of greenwashing by the #ForestStewardshipCouncil, and the heroic work of @agentgreen.bsky.social
If you're in Denmark or Sweden, don't miss great investigative filmmaking by Tom Heinemann at 9:25 pm. bit.ly/3ZLfpJx
Excellent new documentary (available through VPN to Denmark) exposing IKEA's sourcing of wood from destroyed Romanian protected forests, the ongoing scandal of greenwashing by the #ForestStewardshipCouncil, and the heroic work of @agentgreen.bsky.social
🌳 Project developers promised money, jobs, a medical centre, and a school.
🌳 "All empty promises," says Hasan Efendi, a village chief.
reddmonitor.substack.com/p/orf-docume...
🌳 Project developers promised money, jobs, a medical centre, and a school.
🌳 "All empty promises," says Hasan Efendi, a village chief.
reddmonitor.substack.com/p/orf-docume...
Bankers want to get carbon credits for lending money to things which they claim will release less carbon than things they *could* have lent to. What could possibly go wrong...??
bloom.bg/3ZGgzpQ
Bankers want to get carbon credits for lending money to things which they claim will release less carbon than things they *could* have lent to. What could possibly go wrong...??
bloom.bg/3ZGgzpQ
"less than 16% of the carbon credits issued to the investigated projects constitute real emission reductions".
go.nature.com/4fXTSTg
"less than 16% of the carbon credits issued to the investigated projects constitute real emission reductions".
go.nature.com/4fXTSTg