Yes, but it is little more than a call for more oversight. The military actually has a long history of working with autonomous systems - your own troops are fairly predictable but others' can be problematic. I must admit I have more issue with MoD work that might end up with the IDF than with AI-LWS

Outrageously cute!!!

.. oh yeah it's Trump. Not a problem then.

Okay guys. It does depend on who you think the aggressor is. Some say it is NATO of course, and that the Nazis are in Kursk again. From that pov we might want to consider Trump surrendering a lost cause - unlike Hitler/Biden fighting to the last. The challenge is to do it without loss of dignity.

NVIDIA? Okay. An interesting set of uses. So, as a long time reader of RT (I read it for the articles - honest ) I know the early Lancet drones were using FPGAs for something. Their autonomous target tracking seems the obvious, but any suggestions?

Hmm. Not very British.
Years ago we had an EU project with the Nabaztag rabbits.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabaztag
For some reason our admin staff believed that Violet also made vibrators. I can't find a reference. I suspect they had made the rabbits talk dirty to them and the rest was fantasy..

Whish I was able to be there.

... Okay blue sky / BBC that is not what I was looking at when I "shared" the item. The title was something about a data library. I want call-centre data for my research, but to get that requires a commercial partner. A commercial partner requires either results or reputation.. A classic catch-22..

The research councils could then allocate stage 1 funding based on what an organisation can demonstrate on the sample data.

The system is a house of cards. We thought the internet would bring down publishing costs, but it just enabled tougher policing. Prices are stable because that is what the libraries (colleges) will bear. Individuals get screwed. Price has nothing to do with costs.