I don't know much, but I know that progressives will do better without help from Thomas Chatterton Williams than we will do with it. Of course, even without reading it I know this isn't written for us.

"without immediate calamity"

Calamity for who?
Calamity for who, motherfuckers?

Does he come home anxious that he isn’t being a dog perfectly and excelling at, I dunno, fetch?

School left some marks, is all I can say.

Brain. Is. Pudding.

The idea that political success lies in rejecting positions that are universally held by *all* of your voters is galaxy-brained.

“Joyful and committed and fierce. And a deeply rancid antisemite, but why hold that against him? He was fun at parties. Loved his jokes.”

It's not Democrats that have introduced thousands of bills focusing on trans people, it's republicans. This dichotomy where Republicans obsess over these things but it's Dems that get tagged as being obsessed drives me up a wall.

The headline is up there already: Doubts Grow Over Legality of Trump Shooting Passersby on Fifth Avenue

“And how do you plea?”
“Half innocent, your honor”
“So… guilty?”

It’s really simple. If you stand up for my rights, you are my ally. If I do not stand up for yours, I am not your ally.

If you want more allies, stand up for more people, not fewer.

i'm starting to realize people are really saying "solidarity is too hard for me" when they complain about purity tests

No, sheeps.

Surprised they can find time to dine out in between all of the hand to hand combat in the cities.

Considerably better than her usual writing, so