Whitlam would be in a trembling rage over Nauru. Nothing surer.

Good luck finding anything in MSM.

But John Menadue @johnmenadue.com was there :

Or, put another way...

The Shit-lite Party is just the Shit Party is a different coloured tie.

Not really

Al Qaeda only existed because of US support for the mujahedeen.

CIA met with Bin Laden, but decided not to back him because he wasn't malleable enough.

CIA KNEW al Qaeda operatives were in US before 9/11 and did nothing.

The US ALWAYS welcomes the conveniently usable. (eg. K. Barbie)

Yep, agree. At sentencing makes sense to me.

Excellent interview. Heaps of information condensed into a really short timespan.

You so clearly dispatched the myths (justifications) that inevitably come up.

Nice one 👍

Shouldn't be taken into account in any cases.

Whether or not the accused is generally thought of as 'a good bloke' or 'an arsehole' is not relevant to the actual truth - "did they commit the crime?"

There'll be a bunch of defence witnesses willing to testify that, actually, he's a good bloke.

Not laughing

Quaking

Perhaps your words confused him.

Peter Whish-Wilson
Tasmanian Greens Senator

I don't think he was trying to raise doubt. I think he was taking the opportunity to get actual scientists to confirm that 'consensus' does not require unanimity.

A sticking point for shitheads like Roberts.

Maybe the next iteration of John Fucking Howard, shedding its exoskeleton.

What's the sideshow in the background?