unpronounceable
@unpronounceableoq9.bsky.social
24; he/him; gay furry with no idea how to find myself a good username
Rust and Linux enthusiast
Rust and Linux enthusiast
Those werewolf would have to be BIG BIG then!
November 28, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Those werewolf would have to be BIG BIG then!
So ... that means yes right?
November 26, 2025 at 6:46 AM
So ... that means yes right?
(Wild speculation)
Might even be intentional. NPCs you might actually interact *more* and longer with, so the devs get more bang for their buck.
Might even be intentional. NPCs you might actually interact *more* and longer with, so the devs get more bang for their buck.
November 24, 2025 at 4:26 PM
(Wild speculation)
Might even be intentional. NPCs you might actually interact *more* and longer with, so the devs get more bang for their buck.
Might even be intentional. NPCs you might actually interact *more* and longer with, so the devs get more bang for their buck.
It is always friday *somewhere*...
Not really ... but at least in europe it is still 5PM
Not really ... but at least in europe it is still 5PM
November 21, 2025 at 4:29 PM
It is always friday *somewhere*...
Not really ... but at least in europe it is still 5PM
Not really ... but at least in europe it is still 5PM
Cursed knowledge is a gift of kindness!
November 15, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Cursed knowledge is a gift of kindness!
> equally confusing to all present (even furries)
There are kinks to fix that being confusing...
There are kinks to fix that being confusing...
November 12, 2025 at 3:58 PM
> equally confusing to all present (even furries)
There are kinks to fix that being confusing...
There are kinks to fix that being confusing...
I mean with a bit luck it *might* even be the case that that metadata is included in the completion item...
Just not used in the preview window.
Just not used in the preview window.
November 10, 2025 at 5:51 PM
I mean with a bit luck it *might* even be the case that that metadata is included in the completion item...
Just not used in the preview window.
Just not used in the preview window.
I mean instead we use software that is emulating hardware that was made in the 70s /pos
(Also I'm relatively sure it should be possible to add a size limit to that completion window)
(Also I'm relatively sure it should be possible to add a size limit to that completion window)
November 10, 2025 at 5:12 PM
I mean instead we use software that is emulating hardware that was made in the 70s /pos
(Also I'm relatively sure it should be possible to add a size limit to that completion window)
(Also I'm relatively sure it should be possible to add a size limit to that completion window)
It is never just one~~
This mpreg was teamwork!
This mpreg was teamwork!
November 10, 2025 at 4:35 PM
It is never just one~~
This mpreg was teamwork!
This mpreg was teamwork!
It MEE!
I am the energy drink!
I am the energy drink!
November 8, 2025 at 7:18 AM
It MEE!
I am the energy drink!
I am the energy drink!
Fun things about folding proteins AFAIK
November 7, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Fun things about folding proteins AFAIK
May I correct you and say that this is great LIFE advice!
(Or more specifically great advice when learning any skill.)
(Or more specifically great advice when learning any skill.)
November 7, 2025 at 1:58 PM
May I correct you and say that this is great LIFE advice!
(Or more specifically great advice when learning any skill.)
(Or more specifically great advice when learning any skill.)
That sounds like mostly an issue with garbage collection.
Hard to know which objects to keep if you don't have any GC roots...
Hard to know which objects to keep if you don't have any GC roots...
November 6, 2025 at 3:48 PM
That sounds like mostly an issue with garbage collection.
Hard to know which objects to keep if you don't have any GC roots...
Hard to know which objects to keep if you don't have any GC roots...
Times for some cashews!
November 6, 2025 at 9:50 AM
Times for some cashews!
I would say the answer is *resistance* against lightning~~
November 2, 2025 at 11:13 PM
I would say the answer is *resistance* against lightning~~
As an example I mostly learned english not by looking at the first "straight forward answer", but by looking at all the different usages and trying to find the "vibe" of the word.
(Though as consequence I have an extremely hard time at actually *translating* words from and to english)
(Though as consequence I have an extremely hard time at actually *translating* words from and to english)
November 2, 2025 at 10:46 AM
As an example I mostly learned english not by looking at the first "straight forward answer", but by looking at all the different usages and trying to find the "vibe" of the word.
(Though as consequence I have an extremely hard time at actually *translating* words from and to english)
(Though as consequence I have an extremely hard time at actually *translating* words from and to english)
Ye. It is more neutral, more general and a lot less fun to say! /pos
Dictionaries are often relatively bad at capturing the nuances of connotations.
Dictionaries are often relatively bad at capturing the nuances of connotations.
November 2, 2025 at 10:46 AM
Ye. It is more neutral, more general and a lot less fun to say! /pos
Dictionaries are often relatively bad at capturing the nuances of connotations.
Dictionaries are often relatively bad at capturing the nuances of connotations.
I guess if I were asked for a synonym for "in lieu of", I would probably take "in lack of" instead of "instead of".
November 2, 2025 at 9:42 AM
I guess if I were asked for a synonym for "in lieu of", I would probably take "in lack of" instead of "instead of".
Doesn't it *effectively* mean the same?
Like
"we're using [fallback] in lieu of [ideal]" and
"we're using [fallback] instead of [ideal]"
*basically* mean the same thing.
The only difference is probably that "in lieu of" has a stronger connotation that is implying the "fallback/ideal" split.
Like
"we're using [fallback] in lieu of [ideal]" and
"we're using [fallback] instead of [ideal]"
*basically* mean the same thing.
The only difference is probably that "in lieu of" has a stronger connotation that is implying the "fallback/ideal" split.
November 2, 2025 at 9:40 AM
Doesn't it *effectively* mean the same?
Like
"we're using [fallback] in lieu of [ideal]" and
"we're using [fallback] instead of [ideal]"
*basically* mean the same thing.
The only difference is probably that "in lieu of" has a stronger connotation that is implying the "fallback/ideal" split.
Like
"we're using [fallback] in lieu of [ideal]" and
"we're using [fallback] instead of [ideal]"
*basically* mean the same thing.
The only difference is probably that "in lieu of" has a stronger connotation that is implying the "fallback/ideal" split.
On what platform is that?
I recently had problems on linux with terminals not supporting dead keys.
(Like pressing having to press ` twice to actually type it or `a to get à)
I recently had problems on linux with terminals not supporting dead keys.
(Like pressing having to press ` twice to actually type it or `a to get à)
November 1, 2025 at 10:39 PM
On what platform is that?
I recently had problems on linux with terminals not supporting dead keys.
(Like pressing having to press ` twice to actually type it or `a to get à)
I recently had problems on linux with terminals not supporting dead keys.
(Like pressing having to press ` twice to actually type it or `a to get à)
No such thing as too much fans until the computer begins to lift up from the floor~~
November 1, 2025 at 10:33 PM
No such thing as too much fans until the computer begins to lift up from the floor~~
Which I would count as using the value.
A value that is in scope and not dropped counts as "used" to me.
But yeah, I wasn't really clear enough about that 🙂
A value that is in scope and not dropped counts as "used" to me.
But yeah, I wasn't really clear enough about that 🙂
November 1, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Which I would count as using the value.
A value that is in scope and not dropped counts as "used" to me.
But yeah, I wasn't really clear enough about that 🙂
A value that is in scope and not dropped counts as "used" to me.
But yeah, I wasn't really clear enough about that 🙂
If some code is undefined behavior, it is guarantied to never happen, so the compiler is allowed to just remove that piece of code as it wants to. Or even replace it with whatever it wants to...
November 1, 2025 at 6:17 PM
If some code is undefined behavior, it is guarantied to never happen, so the compiler is allowed to just remove that piece of code as it wants to. Or even replace it with whatever it wants to...
I'm *almost* certain that even if all possible instances of `&dyn Stream` are zero sized types it would *still* be undefined behavior.
The compiler is *probably* not acting on it, but still we all know how scary undefined behavior chains can get like if the compiler wants to use them...
The compiler is *probably* not acting on it, but still we all know how scary undefined behavior chains can get like if the compiler wants to use them...
November 1, 2025 at 6:17 PM
I'm *almost* certain that even if all possible instances of `&dyn Stream` are zero sized types it would *still* be undefined behavior.
The compiler is *probably* not acting on it, but still we all know how scary undefined behavior chains can get like if the compiler wants to use them...
The compiler is *probably* not acting on it, but still we all know how scary undefined behavior chains can get like if the compiler wants to use them...