@unlibrarian.bsky.social
Views my own, not those of my employer etc. RT does not imply endorsement.
Wasn't a key promise of the OSA, that there would be an increase in takedowns? Otherwise what's the rest if it even for?
November 21, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Wasn't a key promise of the OSA, that there would be an increase in takedowns? Otherwise what's the rest if it even for?
Isn't this old news? next.ink/171645/dsa-w... (Feb 2025)
DSA : WhatsApp est désormais une très grande plateforme, avec de nouvelles obligations - Next
next.ink
November 11, 2025 at 3:44 PM
Isn't this old news? next.ink/171645/dsa-w... (Feb 2025)
Reposted
Furthermore, the GDPR is to be reviewed in light of the latest CJEU judgement in the EDPS vs SRB case regarding the concept of pseudonymised data. In addition, the GDPR is supposed to get new provision for handling cookies. Moreover, a new Data Retention Regulation will be drafted.
November 6, 2025 at 6:49 AM
Furthermore, the GDPR is to be reviewed in light of the latest CJEU judgement in the EDPS vs SRB case regarding the concept of pseudonymised data. In addition, the GDPR is supposed to get new provision for handling cookies. Moreover, a new Data Retention Regulation will be drafted.
That doesn't really explain how this would translate into a delay in publishing the Register though, unless they only want to do that once they're sure that the Code of Practice they subsequently propose *will* be human rights compliant.
October 20, 2025 at 2:42 PM
That doesn't really explain how this would translate into a delay in publishing the Register though, unless they only want to do that once they're sure that the Code of Practice they subsequently propose *will* be human rights compliant.
Any idea what the "complex human rights issues" are?
Total speculation: Peter Kyle was planning on fixing the underlying issue for Ofcom, but got the axe, and now it's fallen back to Ofcom to stall for time and/or provide some kind of figleaf.
Total speculation: Peter Kyle was planning on fixing the underlying issue for Ofcom, but got the axe, and now it's fallen back to Ofcom to stall for time and/or provide some kind of figleaf.
October 20, 2025 at 12:52 PM
Any idea what the "complex human rights issues" are?
Total speculation: Peter Kyle was planning on fixing the underlying issue for Ofcom, but got the axe, and now it's fallen back to Ofcom to stall for time and/or provide some kind of figleaf.
Total speculation: Peter Kyle was planning on fixing the underlying issue for Ofcom, but got the axe, and now it's fallen back to Ofcom to stall for time and/or provide some kind of figleaf.
@shashankmohan.bsky.social is a common appearance at EU DSA events, esp. those hosted by DTSP, and is super sharp. Not surprising to hear of good work coming from him and his entourage.
October 16, 2025 at 5:30 PM
@shashankmohan.bsky.social is a common appearance at EU DSA events, esp. those hosted by DTSP, and is super sharp. Not surprising to hear of good work coming from him and his entourage.
Eur-lex says October 29th, presumably since DARA (the Delegated Act on Researcher Access) says it comes into effect 20 days after it's published in the EU's Official Journal.
October 13, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Eur-lex says October 29th, presumably since DARA (the Delegated Act on Researcher Access) says it comes into effect 20 days after it's published in the EU's Official Journal.
One might call it a "Streisand order"
September 17, 2025 at 6:00 PM
One might call it a "Streisand order"
What would be the quantum of damages?
I propose a new remedy: if the police has made an arrest for a malicious communications offence, but doesn't proceed to prosecution, the police should be forced to broadcast the message in question itself, to a mass audience.
Think twice next time...
I propose a new remedy: if the police has made an arrest for a malicious communications offence, but doesn't proceed to prosecution, the police should be forced to broadcast the message in question itself, to a mass audience.
Think twice next time...
September 17, 2025 at 5:57 PM
What would be the quantum of damages?
I propose a new remedy: if the police has made an arrest for a malicious communications offence, but doesn't proceed to prosecution, the police should be forced to broadcast the message in question itself, to a mass audience.
Think twice next time...
I propose a new remedy: if the police has made an arrest for a malicious communications offence, but doesn't proceed to prosecution, the police should be forced to broadcast the message in question itself, to a mass audience.
Think twice next time...