Unicorntastic1
@unicorntastic1.bsky.social
Dannatt says he hopes his 56 yrs of service will be taken into consideration. I have and find it more appalling that in the twilight of his career he decided to sellout Britain for personal gain. Both should go to prison not be slapped on the wrists. These crimes are for personal gain; disgusting
November 24, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Dannatt says he hopes his 56 yrs of service will be taken into consideration. I have and find it more appalling that in the twilight of his career he decided to sellout Britain for personal gain. Both should go to prison not be slapped on the wrists. These crimes are for personal gain; disgusting
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
11/ Gill was close to Nigel Farage, a trusted colleague and a senior figure both in Ukip/Brexit party and Reform. The Met police says Farage was not interviewed and there's no suggestion he took bribes / is linked to Gill's case. They say investigations into other unspecified politicians are ongoing
November 23, 2025 at 12:01 PM
11/ Gill was close to Nigel Farage, a trusted colleague and a senior figure both in Ukip/Brexit party and Reform. The Met police says Farage was not interviewed and there's no suggestion he took bribes / is linked to Gill's case. They say investigations into other unspecified politicians are ongoing
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
![11 Dec 2018 At the same session, Coburn and Arnott give similar speeches. Coburn says: “... No government can stand by and do nothing while its journalists are being attacked and murdered. This is thoroughly unacceptable …. The president of the Ukraine and the Rada parliament are, uh, plotting to close TV channels 112 and Channel One [sic]. Can this chamber truthfully say that Ukraine, which behaves this way, is ready for EU entry?”
Arnott says: “Against the backdrop of violence against journalists, the proposed closure of TV channels, I say this to the president and government of Ukraine. Please defend freedom… please ensure freedom of the press.” Speaking to the Guardian this month, Arnott rejected any suggestion that he had links to Russia or was acting in its interests and pointed to another part of his speech in which he said “the best response to a loss of freedom is increased freedom”.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lkvrabjcnztzl3nsbzj53tal/bafkreihpwlob2q7hn6xcenanigpbu2fd4yprtthsvds4v5oyxgbwpqtgkq@jpeg)
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
8/ In these messages Voloshyn asks Gill to arrange for three MEPs to make "comments on camera". He mentions ex-Ukip/Brexit party MEPs Jonathan Arnott and David Coburn. There's no suggestion Arnott & Coburn took bribes, knew about Voloshyn, or agreed to this particular proposal
![Voloshyn: "I've aksed V [Medvedchuk] Get xxx please and Coburn as well. I will get 5 for you if you get these three comments on camera". "Or Arnott". "We need three" Gill: "OK" "What time and where" V: "They are to come to EP in roughly an hour" Gill: "OK" "All three here"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lkvrabjcnztzl3nsbzj53tal/bafkreibn6emgy23ccdnomrkp6mztork3os3binghwpb3qpgkotphpcf3yq@jpeg)
November 23, 2025 at 11:56 AM
8/ In these messages Voloshyn asks Gill to arrange for three MEPs to make "comments on camera". He mentions ex-Ukip/Brexit party MEPs Jonathan Arnott and David Coburn. There's no suggestion Arnott & Coburn took bribes, knew about Voloshyn, or agreed to this particular proposal
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
7/ And the related video from the police evidence file, the Channel 112 interview in which Gill speaks in defence of Medvedchuk
November 23, 2025 at 11:53 AM
7/ And the related video from the police evidence file, the Channel 112 interview in which Gill speaks in defence of Medvedchuk
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
6/ Also included is this bribery count...
![Bribery count 3 5 Feb 2019
“This charge relates to Mr Gill’s appearance on the television channel 112 Ukraine where he is critical of the Ukrainian decision to open criminal proceedings against Viktor Medvedchuk for high treason … Mr Voloshyn asks Mr Gill to make a ‘short pointed comment … expressing that it was ‘unacceptable to persecute [a] person for political convictions let alone for offering new ways to bring peace to war in Donbass’.”
5 Feb 2019: Gill speaks to Channel 112 Ukraine. He gives an opinion piece to camera in defence of Victor Medvedchuk which “closely followed the line given to him by Mr Voloshyn”. Gill is paid “‘5k” for doing so.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lkvrabjcnztzl3nsbzj53tal/bafkreib5glw5ngr4ldjqsxdeocvktuoav67ofze2uptmibyqrjc372nmfa@jpeg)
November 23, 2025 at 11:53 AM
6/ Also included is this bribery count...
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
5/ We're also publishing a large portion of the evidence file, which includes WhatsApp messages with his handler/bribe funnel Oleh Voloshyn, clips from Gill's pro-Russian media statetments and from his police interviews. Here's one WhatsApp message- 'gifts' is a reference to cash
November 23, 2025 at 11:53 AM
5/ We're also publishing a large portion of the evidence file, which includes WhatsApp messages with his handler/bribe funnel Oleh Voloshyn, clips from Gill's pro-Russian media statetments and from his police interviews. Here's one WhatsApp message- 'gifts' is a reference to cash
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
4/ As a fiercely independent news platform, we believe it's important that the public can access the detail of the case. And now we are publishing our timeline online. It details all of Gill's charges and related activity, including this one:
![Bribery count 2 6-12 Dec 2018
(All quotations relating to bribes are from the CPS court case summary. Count 1 – a summary – is not included here)
“This charge relates to the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement Debate … Messages from Mr Gill’s mobile device evidence an agreement made via WhatsApp for Mr Gill to receive a scripted contribution to the debate from Mr Voloshyn after which he would receive ‘xmas gifts’ and ‘post cards’, which are alleged to be coded references to money.”
11 Dec 2018: Following a vote in October by the Ukrainian parliament to close Channel 112 and NewsOne as “aggressive influence[s] of destructive propaganda”, Gill gives a speech in the European parliament: “We've seen activists and journalists alike being violently attacked by radicals … How can this be, that the president of Ukraine can potentially close down independent media just before an election?”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lkvrabjcnztzl3nsbzj53tal/bafkreidokff6o5xdsvzavyrs6jwnrp6rzh6xf5lm72ammbxbysftijfut4@jpeg)
November 23, 2025 at 11:53 AM
4/ As a fiercely independent news platform, we believe it's important that the public can access the detail of the case. And now we are publishing our timeline online. It details all of Gill's charges and related activity, including this one:
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
3/ We gave this timeline of evidence, the charges and context out outside court. No one had heard of Gill. Of course, it's hard for stories to cut through. But it's made harder when only 2 papers - Guardian & Mirror - mention the conviction/story on their front page & only one prints Gill's picture🙄
November 23, 2025 at 11:53 AM
3/ We gave this timeline of evidence, the charges and context out outside court. No one had heard of Gill. Of course, it's hard for stories to cut through. But it's made harder when only 2 papers - Guardian & Mirror - mention the conviction/story on their front page & only one prints Gill's picture🙄
Reposted by Unicorntastic1
WhatsApps reveal Gill sought to recruit other Brexit/Reform MEPs to make pro-Kremlin statements and that Gill’s handler took orders from Viktor Medvedchuk, a close Putin ally. It's a complex, detail-heavy story. So we went back to journalism's roots and made a pamphlet to hand out at the Old Bailey.
November 23, 2025 at 11:53 AM
WhatsApps reveal Gill sought to recruit other Brexit/Reform MEPs to make pro-Kremlin statements and that Gill’s handler took orders from Viktor Medvedchuk, a close Putin ally. It's a complex, detail-heavy story. So we went back to journalism's roots and made a pamphlet to hand out at the Old Bailey.
I’m not a fan of “saving 600m” when they were making crazy profits the train companies have agreed to this bcoz they know the majority want them nationalised. It’s a pr move otherwise they’d reduce fares and take less profit.
November 23, 2025 at 9:48 AM
I’m not a fan of “saving 600m” when they were making crazy profits the train companies have agreed to this bcoz they know the majority want them nationalised. It’s a pr move otherwise they’d reduce fares and take less profit.