Ok, great, thanks for replying - to avoid misleading viewers you better put that on your images then -‘ not real data’

Source?

I’ve written to BBC to complain vociferously on behalf of myself and 16 year old son. NEVER been a more important time for science-fact broadcasting, rather than pseudo-science opinion-casting.

Knowing that Trump won’t be able to keep his mouth shut when he meets Putin, I’m sure Z will say as little as possible, and probably now thinks it’s a massive waste of time.

‘Swarmbots’ - self powered, moving, communicating… all we need is self replicating and we’ve a full house for Grey-Goo.

FFS man, how am I supposed to sleep now??v

Spasminganus. That’s going to be my handle from now. Or his.

Hmm I think it looks a lot more like a skin lesion through a dermatoscope. Just saying…

What time will first image be released?

Article is not really expert analysis…

Which of those versions represents what human eye would see, in situ?

Can you show the last three years, and see if you see the same dip every winter?

False flag? That’s my immediate reaction….