HE WAS A CONSUL OF ROME!
a man says he was a consul of rome in front of another man
ALT: a man says he was a consul of rome in front of another man
media.tenor.com
November 26, 2025 at 7:40 PM
HE WAS A CONSUL OF ROME!
As an aside, your bluesky handle is brilliant.
November 25, 2025 at 9:53 AM
As an aside, your bluesky handle is brilliant.
All the pieces matter.
a man sits at a desk reading a book titled " triumph of the humanities "
Alt: Natural police.
media.tenor.com
November 24, 2025 at 1:37 PM
All the pieces matter.
Polanski and Farage. Two cheeks of the same populist backside.
November 24, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Polanski and Farage. Two cheeks of the same populist backside.
Yeah but they won the argument innit. Thats what matters. Not governing, but winning the argument.
Hence Polanski. Who has a ton of problems of his own that they are not talking about whatsoever.
Hence Polanski. Who has a ton of problems of his own that they are not talking about whatsoever.
November 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Yeah but they won the argument innit. Thats what matters. Not governing, but winning the argument.
Hence Polanski. Who has a ton of problems of his own that they are not talking about whatsoever.
Hence Polanski. Who has a ton of problems of his own that they are not talking about whatsoever.
Their moments are few and far between in all honesty.
I remember when the first budget was released, which was reasonable and good before the 'black hole' they bent over backwards to portray it as bad. They described it as a 'polycrisis'.
Fuckin seriously?! Christ.
I remember when the first budget was released, which was reasonable and good before the 'black hole' they bent over backwards to portray it as bad. They described it as a 'polycrisis'.
Fuckin seriously?! Christ.
November 24, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Their moments are few and far between in all honesty.
I remember when the first budget was released, which was reasonable and good before the 'black hole' they bent over backwards to portray it as bad. They described it as a 'polycrisis'.
Fuckin seriously?! Christ.
I remember when the first budget was released, which was reasonable and good before the 'black hole' they bent over backwards to portray it as bad. They described it as a 'polycrisis'.
Fuckin seriously?! Christ.
Oh yeah, they have thrown trans people under the bus consistently.
Also they have a North of England correspondent that has only written one article concerned about the north so far this year.
Also using the northern working class as a prop for their far left bullshit.
Also they have a North of England correspondent that has only written one article concerned about the north so far this year.
Also using the northern working class as a prop for their far left bullshit.
November 24, 2025 at 9:51 AM
Oh yeah, they have thrown trans people under the bus consistently.
Also they have a North of England correspondent that has only written one article concerned about the north so far this year.
Also using the northern working class as a prop for their far left bullshit.
Also they have a North of England correspondent that has only written one article concerned about the north so far this year.
Also using the northern working class as a prop for their far left bullshit.
Corbs is out of vogue now, and hypno-tits is now popular so the seagulls are now following a different trawler.
NM just parrots what is popular - no original reporting and they always ask for donations for their unoriginal blerbs.
NM just parrots what is popular - no original reporting and they always ask for donations for their unoriginal blerbs.
November 24, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Corbs is out of vogue now, and hypno-tits is now popular so the seagulls are now following a different trawler.
NM just parrots what is popular - no original reporting and they always ask for donations for their unoriginal blerbs.
NM just parrots what is popular - no original reporting and they always ask for donations for their unoriginal blerbs.
The sycophantic slobbering over Polanski is also very cringe.
But yeah, dont say anything about the BBC fighting back, cos unlike NM, the BBC has somewhat of a spine.
But yeah, dont say anything about the BBC fighting back, cos unlike NM, the BBC has somewhat of a spine.
November 24, 2025 at 9:30 AM
The sycophantic slobbering over Polanski is also very cringe.
But yeah, dont say anything about the BBC fighting back, cos unlike NM, the BBC has somewhat of a spine.
But yeah, dont say anything about the BBC fighting back, cos unlike NM, the BBC has somewhat of a spine.
Gill's and Farages speeches were almost identical however Gill was prosecuted.
Also, Farage still hasn't explained the situation with his mistress's house in Clacton.
Or the racism allegations in his youth.
Or being friendly with rapists, nonces and racists.
Oh, and #farageriots.
Also, Farage still hasn't explained the situation with his mistress's house in Clacton.
Or the racism allegations in his youth.
Or being friendly with rapists, nonces and racists.
Oh, and #farageriots.
November 21, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Gill's and Farages speeches were almost identical however Gill was prosecuted.
Also, Farage still hasn't explained the situation with his mistress's house in Clacton.
Or the racism allegations in his youth.
Or being friendly with rapists, nonces and racists.
Oh, and #farageriots.
Also, Farage still hasn't explained the situation with his mistress's house in Clacton.
Or the racism allegations in his youth.
Or being friendly with rapists, nonces and racists.
Oh, and #farageriots.
Smashing. So you now have read it rather than just relying on secondary sources and headlines. And essentially you admit you didn't read it previously.
So you've argued in bad faith all this time. Cool cool.
Muted.
So you've argued in bad faith all this time. Cool cool.
Muted.
November 19, 2025 at 6:49 AM
Smashing. So you now have read it rather than just relying on secondary sources and headlines. And essentially you admit you didn't read it previously.
So you've argued in bad faith all this time. Cool cool.
Muted.
So you've argued in bad faith all this time. Cool cool.
Muted.
Its odd that rather than reading the legislation yourself, you want me to 'quote chapter and verse' just for you.
And you're inferring that I'm being obtuse because you mentioned children, despite me saying the legislation involving children already.
As I said, read it for yourself.
And you're inferring that I'm being obtuse because you mentioned children, despite me saying the legislation involving children already.
As I said, read it for yourself.
November 19, 2025 at 6:43 AM
Its odd that rather than reading the legislation yourself, you want me to 'quote chapter and verse' just for you.
And you're inferring that I'm being obtuse because you mentioned children, despite me saying the legislation involving children already.
As I said, read it for yourself.
And you're inferring that I'm being obtuse because you mentioned children, despite me saying the legislation involving children already.
As I said, read it for yourself.
I quoted something, you asked me to break down a piece of legislation for you like I'm your PA, I said read it for yourself.
If you want to know the ins and outs, stop and read the legisy instead of just reading the headline. You won't look like such an idiot next time.
If you want to know the ins and outs, stop and read the legisy instead of just reading the headline. You won't look like such an idiot next time.
November 19, 2025 at 4:06 AM
I quoted something, you asked me to break down a piece of legislation for you like I'm your PA, I said read it for yourself.
If you want to know the ins and outs, stop and read the legisy instead of just reading the headline. You won't look like such an idiot next time.
If you want to know the ins and outs, stop and read the legisy instead of just reading the headline. You won't look like such an idiot next time.
Again, I am not going to go through the entirety of the new asylum reforms with you step by step.
However, if it makes you feel better to call me a liar, go right ahead. It won't make you right, but it will make you feel better.
Seriously, read it for yourself, FFS.
However, if it makes you feel better to call me a liar, go right ahead. It won't make you right, but it will make you feel better.
Seriously, read it for yourself, FFS.
November 18, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Again, I am not going to go through the entirety of the new asylum reforms with you step by step.
However, if it makes you feel better to call me a liar, go right ahead. It won't make you right, but it will make you feel better.
Seriously, read it for yourself, FFS.
However, if it makes you feel better to call me a liar, go right ahead. It won't make you right, but it will make you feel better.
Seriously, read it for yourself, FFS.
Again, you havent read the legislation. I suggest you read it instead of asking a talking toaster on Bluesky to explain it to you.
November 18, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Again, you havent read the legislation. I suggest you read it instead of asking a talking toaster on Bluesky to explain it to you.
LA SOUREE SUR LA TABLE?
November 18, 2025 at 2:42 PM
LA SOUREE SUR LA TABLE?
This is how I can tell that you havent actually read the legislation.
Immediate relatives, like children, can stay.
Maybe you should read the legislation first, rather than being all self-righteous about the inhumanity of a piece of legislation you havent even read.
Immediate relatives, like children, can stay.
Maybe you should read the legislation first, rather than being all self-righteous about the inhumanity of a piece of legislation you havent even read.
November 18, 2025 at 12:46 PM
This is how I can tell that you havent actually read the legislation.
Immediate relatives, like children, can stay.
Maybe you should read the legislation first, rather than being all self-righteous about the inhumanity of a piece of legislation you havent even read.
Immediate relatives, like children, can stay.
Maybe you should read the legislation first, rather than being all self-righteous about the inhumanity of a piece of legislation you havent even read.
Under the new reforms, refugees are granted temporary status which lasts 2.5 years, which is renewed if there is still an issue within their home country.
November 18, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Under the new reforms, refugees are granted temporary status which lasts 2.5 years, which is renewed if there is still an issue within their home country.
Indefinite leave to remain isnt a human right enshrined in law. Time frames can be set. Other countries set stipulations as well.
November 18, 2025 at 12:17 PM
Indefinite leave to remain isnt a human right enshrined in law. Time frames can be set. Other countries set stipulations as well.
Why is it morally wrong? I am genuinely unsure why people are so up in arms about this.
November 18, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Why is it morally wrong? I am genuinely unsure why people are so up in arms about this.