Ulrich Glogowsky
banner
uglogowsky.bsky.social
Ulrich Glogowsky
@uglogowsky.bsky.social
Economist @jku_econ & @jkulinz | Previously @LMU_Muenchen | Public Economics | Behavioral Economics | glogowsky.com |
I truly enjoyed every minute of my stay! Thanks so much for having me and for all the discussions!
May 22, 2025 at 4:17 AM
Thank you for a fantastic visit. I really enjoyed my stay with many great conversations and a very welcoming atmosphere! Hope to see you all again soon.
May 19, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Thanks so much. It took some time :)
April 10, 2025 at 7:36 PM
👉 For all the details (data, methods, and more findings), check out the full paper published in European Economic Review. Read it here: doi.org/10.1016/j.eu...

#GenderEquality #Economics
Redirecting
doi.org
April 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Better news: smart policy can help! In 2007, Germany overhauled parental leave (introducing Elterngeld) to encourage quicker returns to work. It worked – the long-run motherhood penalty fell by ~5–10%, helping to stop the gender gap from growing further.
April 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Policy matters: 1979–1992, Germany expanded paid parental leave from 2 months to 36 months! Well-intended, but longer breaks kept moms out of work. We find these reforms alone explain ~1/3 of the rise in child-related gender inequality over that period.
April 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM
📈 Particularly, the 'motherhood penalty' has ballooned over time. In the 1960s, 10 years after having a child, a German mother's earnings were ~35% lower than if she never had kids. By the 2000s, due to children, moms' earnings were ~60% lower a decade after birth.
April 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Drivers of the increase: Fewer women having kids (✅ small gap reduction), bigger child penalty (❌ gap widens), higher moms' earning potential (❌ gap widens). The last two forces dominate, causing child-related inequality to surge.
April 10, 2025 at 2:21 PM