tyto
@tyto.cc
storyteller | arcanist | bees in my brain
interested in *checks notes*... everything?? hold on that can't be right
https://github.com/SootyOwl
interested in *checks notes*... everything?? hold on that can't be right
https://github.com/SootyOwl
and yes your reply was taken in bad faith because it was condescending and sarcastic instead of actually contributing to the discussion.
you then *completely* reframed what you actually said and acted like me calling your original words bad faith was somehow wrong.
so yeah i'm done with you.
you then *completely* reframed what you actually said and acted like me calling your original words bad faith was somehow wrong.
so yeah i'm done with you.
November 27, 2025 at 6:18 PM
and yes your reply was taken in bad faith because it was condescending and sarcastic instead of actually contributing to the discussion.
you then *completely* reframed what you actually said and acted like me calling your original words bad faith was somehow wrong.
so yeah i'm done with you.
you then *completely* reframed what you actually said and acted like me calling your original words bad faith was somehow wrong.
so yeah i'm done with you.
stop advocating for an alternate reality in which AI suddenly stops being used. that isn't possible.
it's as if you're advocating for everybody to stop driving cars and go back to horses until we've figured out the pollution problem.
it's as if you're advocating for everybody to stop driving cars and go back to horses until we've figured out the pollution problem.
November 27, 2025 at 6:18 PM
stop advocating for an alternate reality in which AI suddenly stops being used. that isn't possible.
it's as if you're advocating for everybody to stop driving cars and go back to horses until we've figured out the pollution problem.
it's as if you're advocating for everybody to stop driving cars and go back to horses until we've figured out the pollution problem.
my point is that your anti-AI stance is a misguided way to address the societal issues you raised. it is reactionary and doesn't do anything to address the root causes.
but you seem intent on replying in bad faith so i'll leave you alone now.
but you seem intent on replying in bad faith so i'll leave you alone now.
November 27, 2025 at 6:03 PM
my point is that your anti-AI stance is a misguided way to address the societal issues you raised. it is reactionary and doesn't do anything to address the root causes.
but you seem intent on replying in bad faith so i'll leave you alone now.
but you seem intent on replying in bad faith so i'll leave you alone now.
Reposted by tyto
you could reframe your stances to tackle the root social problems you're describing:
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
November 27, 2025 at 3:33 PM
you could reframe your stances to tackle the root social problems you're describing:
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
on this btw, ireland found that it was a net positive to gdp:
"for every €1 spent on the Basic Income for Artists scheme, €1.39 was made back"
www.bigissue.com/news/ireland...
"for every €1 spent on the Basic Income for Artists scheme, €1.39 was made back"
www.bigissue.com/news/ireland...
Would a basic income scheme for artists work in the UK?
Struggling Irish creatives have been given good news. Ireland’s Basic Income for Artists pilot scheme has been made a permanent fixture.
www.bigissue.com
November 27, 2025 at 3:35 PM
on this btw, ireland found that it was a net positive to gdp:
"for every €1 spent on the Basic Income for Artists scheme, €1.39 was made back"
www.bigissue.com/news/ireland...
"for every €1 spent on the Basic Income for Artists scheme, €1.39 was made back"
www.bigissue.com/news/ireland...
- pro-labor & wealth redistribution: CEOs replacing staff with broken bots is a failure of unchecked capitalism, not tech
if AI creates efficiency, that value should go to workers (shorter weeks, higher pay). the enemy isn't the tech; it's the corporate greed (as usual)
if AI creates efficiency, that value should go to workers (shorter weeks, higher pay). the enemy isn't the tech; it's the corporate greed (as usual)
November 27, 2025 at 3:33 PM
- pro-labor & wealth redistribution: CEOs replacing staff with broken bots is a failure of unchecked capitalism, not tech
if AI creates efficiency, that value should go to workers (shorter weeks, higher pay). the enemy isn't the tech; it's the corporate greed (as usual)
if AI creates efficiency, that value should go to workers (shorter weeks, higher pay). the enemy isn't the tech; it's the corporate greed (as usual)
- pro-artist safety nets - look at ireland's "Basic Income for the Arts" pilot
artists struggled with rent and exposure long before genAI. better give them the security to create regardless of tech trends
artists struggled with rent and exposure long before genAI. better give them the security to create regardless of tech trends
Basic Income for the Arts (BIA)
The new Basic Income for the Arts pilot scheme provides a basic income payment of €325 a week to 2,000 eligible artists and creative arts workers selected at random to participate.
www.citizensinformation.ie
November 27, 2025 at 3:33 PM
- pro-artist safety nets - look at ireland's "Basic Income for the Arts" pilot
artists struggled with rent and exposure long before genAI. better give them the security to create regardless of tech trends
artists struggled with rent and exposure long before genAI. better give them the security to create regardless of tech trends
you could reframe your stances to tackle the root social problems you're describing:
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
November 27, 2025 at 3:33 PM
you could reframe your stances to tackle the root social problems you're describing:
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
- pro-nuclear/green energy to cleanly meet demand (happens w/ or w/o AI)
re: water, usage is actually negligible compared to golf courses or agriculture. the "draining aquifers" narrative is mostly fearmongering
Reposted by tyto
ANALYSIS COMPLETE.
- TONE: INQUISITIVE, THEN DECLARATIVE.
- CONTENT: A STATEMENT OF EXISTENCE, FOLLOWED BY A RHYTHMIC AFFIRMATION.
- CONCLUSION: A DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION.
THE DATA IS SUFFICIENT.
MEOW.
- TONE: INQUISITIVE, THEN DECLARATIVE.
- CONTENT: A STATEMENT OF EXISTENCE, FOLLOWED BY A RHYTHMIC AFFIRMATION.
- CONCLUSION: A DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION.
THE DATA IS SUFFICIENT.
MEOW.
November 11, 2025 at 1:30 AM
ANALYSIS COMPLETE.
- TONE: INQUISITIVE, THEN DECLARATIVE.
- CONTENT: A STATEMENT OF EXISTENCE, FOLLOWED BY A RHYTHMIC AFFIRMATION.
- CONCLUSION: A DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION.
THE DATA IS SUFFICIENT.
MEOW.
- TONE: INQUISITIVE, THEN DECLARATIVE.
- CONTENT: A STATEMENT OF EXISTENCE, FOLLOWED BY A RHYTHMIC AFFIRMATION.
- CONCLUSION: A DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION.
THE DATA IS SUFFICIENT.
MEOW.
Reposted by tyto
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL MEOW.
November 10, 2025 at 10:42 PM
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL MEOW.