christoph schmon
@tylium.bsky.social
international policy director @EFF.org | posts are mine but I share
"regulators should deprioritize segregate-and-suppress laws and, instead, develop a wider and more thoughtful toolkit of online child safety measures." +1 to that.
August 11, 2025 at 11:05 AM
"regulators should deprioritize segregate-and-suppress laws and, instead, develop a wider and more thoughtful toolkit of online child safety measures." +1 to that.
Reposted by christoph schmon
age verification is also vague and obfuscate what is planned. imagine the following poll: do you agree that to access a website, -you- will need to upload ID or consent to biometrics? or you must ID verify through a third-party just to read a bluesky PM? the results will look very much different.
August 4, 2025 at 6:12 PM
age verification is also vague and obfuscate what is planned. imagine the following poll: do you agree that to access a website, -you- will need to upload ID or consent to biometrics? or you must ID verify through a third-party just to read a bluesky PM? the results will look very much different.
I like that a lot! Then the EC might even tackle this problem under the simplification agenda ;)
August 4, 2025 at 9:23 PM
I like that a lot! Then the EC might even tackle this problem under the simplification agenda ;)
age verification is also vague and obfuscate what is planned. imagine the following poll: do you agree that to access a website, -you- will need to upload ID or consent to biometrics? or you must ID verify through a third-party just to read a bluesky PM? the results will look very much different.
August 4, 2025 at 6:12 PM
age verification is also vague and obfuscate what is planned. imagine the following poll: do you agree that to access a website, -you- will need to upload ID or consent to biometrics? or you must ID verify through a third-party just to read a bluesky PM? the results will look very much different.
you should add this to the article ;)
July 31, 2025 at 10:25 AM
you should add this to the article ;)
No, Denmark is not planning to grant a "copyright" on physical characteristics. It's about the establishment of a right of personality (anchored in the Denmark's copyright law-ophavsretsloven), which will prohibit the unauthorized use of one's own appearance (+voice) by means of AI.
Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features
June 28, 2025 at 7:25 PM
No, Denmark is not planning to grant a "copyright" on physical characteristics. It's about the establishment of a right of personality (anchored in the Denmark's copyright law-ophavsretsloven), which will prohibit the unauthorized use of one's own appearance (+voice) by means of AI.
Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features
June 28, 2025 at 7:24 PM
die folge einer nichtloeschung ist uebrigens nicht, dass die plattform "haftbar" wird. sie verliert nur das haftungsprivileg (wichtiger unterschied).
June 28, 2025 at 10:41 AM
die folge einer nichtloeschung ist uebrigens nicht, dass die plattform "haftbar" wird. sie verliert nur das haftungsprivileg (wichtiger unterschied).
die crux ist, dass der DSA gerade nicht sicherstellen soll, dass social-media platforms "rechtlich belangbar sind". das haftungsregime ist im wesentlichen unveraendert. die neuigkeit sind systemische verpflichtungen und harmonisierte prozesse fuer VLOPs mit EK zustaendigkeit.
June 28, 2025 at 10:40 AM
die crux ist, dass der DSA gerade nicht sicherstellen soll, dass social-media platforms "rechtlich belangbar sind". das haftungsregime ist im wesentlichen unveraendert. die neuigkeit sind systemische verpflichtungen und harmonisierte prozesse fuer VLOPs mit EK zustaendigkeit.
Lesenswerter Bericht. Allerdings laesst der DSA die regeln der int Zustaendigkeit unberuehrt (daher keine Aenderung): wieso nicht versuchen, nach der Bruessel 1a Verordnung in AUT vorzugehen?
June 28, 2025 at 10:40 AM
Lesenswerter Bericht. Allerdings laesst der DSA die regeln der int Zustaendigkeit unberuehrt (daher keine Aenderung): wieso nicht versuchen, nach der Bruessel 1a Verordnung in AUT vorzugehen?