Interesting to note that many white male candidates get much less scrutiny.

Wait, Bluesky is Meta now?

That is good to know she hasn't taken AIPAC money. I like her and think she is a great fighter, but as a Senate candidate she will have more scrutiny than a house candidate.

I feel like I know him more than any other politician; because I have seen him, good and bad, warts and all, what he wants us to see and what he doesn't in his Reddit posts

This article helps me know him even more, and is a great insight into someone who knows how to fight and won't run from it.

Imagine if we had 8 Hurricane Katrina-like events in one year in the US; now imagine 20. Might wanna take their class.

Do not go to Starbucks until the strike is over and the workers get what they want-fixed.

They are now literally getting away with murder, not like they haven't, but this is blatant in the open, almost like a test. Other countries will be next.

What makes you say he didn't need the money?

He is my #2 right after Graham.

I would argue that Graham Platner's poor judgement than the arguments of say, other politicians that commit fraud and are complicit in genocide.

Chip in to elect a grassroots candidate who DOESN’T like war crimes (which is apparently a controversial position) here: secure.actblue.com/donate/abu-b...

She works for Preti Strategies, a lobbying firm with corporate clients from the insurance industry and other large corporations. SHE is the one that wasn't vetted.

@tuckerforcongress.bsky.social Is Definitely my #1 or #2 choice right now.