@twezaldwarf.bsky.social
Reposted
(This is actually how Youtube handles their 'advertiser-friendly' review process, and while the need to do so in the first place sucks, it's a much more amicable and user-friendly way to handle it.)
August 15, 2025 at 4:34 AM
(This is actually how Youtube handles their 'advertiser-friendly' review process, and while the need to do so in the first place sucks, it's a much more amicable and user-friendly way to handle it.)
Reposted
Also was a good chance to call for improvements to labels.
One idea I had is to grant accounts 'trusted' status if they're old enough / have no violations. They could automatically appeal improper labels on their own posts, with the review happening later to ensure no abuse is taking place.
One idea I had is to grant accounts 'trusted' status if they're old enough / have no violations. They could automatically appeal improper labels on their own posts, with the review happening later to ensure no abuse is taking place.
August 15, 2025 at 4:30 AM
Also was a good chance to call for improvements to labels.
One idea I had is to grant accounts 'trusted' status if they're old enough / have no violations. They could automatically appeal improper labels on their own posts, with the review happening later to ensure no abuse is taking place.
One idea I had is to grant accounts 'trusted' status if they're old enough / have no violations. They could automatically appeal improper labels on their own posts, with the review happening later to ensure no abuse is taking place.