Tsilkani
banner
tsilkani.bsky.social
Tsilkani
@tsilkani.bsky.social
RPGs and depression and shitposts and trying to be better.

he/him
What do you mean, that's This World™!
August 21, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Can I handle the truth?
August 16, 2025 at 4:54 PM
Did you bolt upright in bed when umamity came to you?
August 16, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Well, according to the internet, cum?
August 10, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Home Depot can send masks to any store near you with a little advance notice, too.
July 27, 2025 at 12:34 AM
Always been the same thing.
July 25, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Hey remember how about a year ago Zak gave his book away to people in exchange for them making accounts on various forums, Discords, and social media websites, and to 'await further instructions'?

Just... something that comes to mind, all of a sudden.
July 25, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Well, remember back at the end of last year Zak was offering a copy of his book to people who would go set up accounts on various forums, discords, and social media websites and start posting normally, and 'await further instructions'?
July 25, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Wait until the Icelandic Kennel Club chimes in.
July 18, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Except we get to watch it coming day after day after day.
April 3, 2025 at 1:35 AM
PoD is gonna be the way to do it going forward, especially for smaller stuff like most indie games. Saves you storage, shipping, all that mess.
April 2, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Zak S is a rapist and a harasser, you're carping for a rapist and harasser, and I'm not particularly interested in listening to rapists and harassers or those who support them.
April 1, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Ah yes, because men have never forced women into sex before.

As for the lack of criminal cases, probably something to do with the horrifyingly low rape conviction rate in the US, and the stigma female rape reporters experience. Like the harassment Zak is putting these women through, for instance.
April 1, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Ah, so you are a hypocrite. Well then, I'm going to go ahead and block you, because you're clearly only here to cherrypick the court's statements, while I have acknowledged both the statements found true and those found false. Have fun out there defending a rapist and harasser.
March 31, 2025 at 2:20 AM
I agree that the court ruled that Zak did not physically force Vivka to move in with her. Will you agree that the court, in the same case, ruled six other statements about Zak coercing Vivka into sex to be true? Because if not, you're a hypocrite.
March 31, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Furthermore, even if I did present you any sort of proof, you'd just say it was wrong because Zak told you so.

I trust the court system more than I trust Zak S, a rapist and harasser who has been previously repeatedly caught out in lies.
March 31, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Because it's a question with no useful purpose. I don't have to relitigate what happened in the courtroom, there was an entire trial that did that for me, and according to the judge's statement most of what Vivka said was found to be true.
March 31, 2025 at 2:05 AM
The court also ruled that 6 of her statements about Zak being a rapist who coerced her into sex were true. Why is it you never acknowledge that? This is the same court who awarded him that whole dollar, clearly you think they're just and correct because you keep posting the ruling.
March 31, 2025 at 1:53 AM
You're sitting there talking about the judgement in the most broad, vague terms hoping that's all people will look at, when in fact the court ruled that most of what Vivka said about Zak the abuser was true, and says so in the detailed statement released at the end of the trial.
March 31, 2025 at 1:47 AM
You do realize that what you keep posting doesn't invalidate anything I've posted, right? Zak was awarded $1 as a result of the court finding one of the defendant's statements false by a strict definition of the word force, but at the same time the court found 6 other statements to be true.
March 31, 2025 at 1:47 AM
The judge has already looked at the proof and made statements, which I copied and pasted above. I just have to refer to the Final Statement of Decision filed with the Superior Court of California County Of Los Angeles.
March 31, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Directly referencing the final statement of the court record is not a crime, and the fact that you say it is is just more proof of how you're willing to lie to protect a rapist.
March 31, 2025 at 1:32 AM