I saw Amanda Palmer's response to her lawsuit against her and NG's victim and it totally belies her position as an advocate for SA survivors. Unless, by survivors, she meant free labor or fodder for her estranged husband.

But look on the bright side, no one there will be informed enough or in a position to correct this, so... less work?

They all just mean "left of me" because they are all the center of the universe. That's what being "right" means to them.

Or adopt it ironically because the current generation is already rejecting.

Will they wear actual jack boots?

Heh

Sorry, I’ll leave off what is clearly a tangent to your point. Clearly the SS (!) decision is a deal breaker but I’m looking ahead at the systemic challenge. I feel like we keep moving into ghettos where we’re easier to marginalize and silence.

I mean, I definitely don’t want to be where the Nazis are, but it seems eventually every tech service capitulates on “1A concerns.” I see that Beehiiv has a policy rejecting hate speech but substack did too.

Well, I didn’t know that. Won’t every platform eventually have them though? Isn’t that their goal? To keep moving in so we move away? Until we’re chanting alone in caves?

The way I would lie

Happy New Year!🎂

I was already done with MSNBCs backing off coverage and capitulating to conservative threats. Now they’re embracing the erasure of minority voices.

I mean turnabout is fair play

Thanks

I mean while we’re waiting for the show we’re all clearly excited for, this conversation is just a natural start to occupy ourselves with. I’m not prejudging (I hope.) And it is a good point that ideas of what agendered looks like are full of personal and cultural biases.

I see that too. Might be projection on my part but I see it in their protectiveness.