Didn't Threema & Signal give up on working with Whatsapp on this more than a year ago? The two services that Meta now worked with are super obscure just so Meta can say "we complied". The interoperability requires opt-in. Is the optimism just based on a Meta press-release or am I missing something?

Possible... But if it's just a review of someone else's prompts, would flattery really work? I would rate such a response as too much... Isn't it more likely that, in the competitive AI market, they use some NLP deliberately to make users bond with the product & get better Human Preference Ratings?

Please don't. You would take something good, rare and beautiful from this world, of which the world needs all it can get and which makes it worthwhile in the first place.

I'm confused... Doesn't that exist and isn't that also what monitors are?
The main reason they don't sell well in TV-sizes is because TVs are much cheaper because selling your data is taken into account by the manufacturer.

Sorry, es ging mir nicht um den gesamten Blogeintrag. Die Posts auf die ich geantwortet habe bewerben (impliziert oder explizit) eine von dir erstellte Liste. War vorher nicht (deutlich?) verlinkt, Author fehlt immer noch. Tut mir Leid wenn solche Anmerkungen/Hinweise unsympathisch empfunden werden

Sorry, es ging mir nicht um den gesamten Blogeintrag. Die Posts auf die ich geantwortet habe bewerben (impliziert oder explizit) eine von dir erstellte Liste. War vorher nicht (deutlich?) verlinkt, Author fehlt immer noch. Tut mir Leid wenn solche Anmerkungen/Hinweise unsympathisch empfunden werden

Hat er nicht gebaut sondern kopiert, kam mir gleich bekannt vor... Nicht dass auf Deutsch übersetzen keinen Wert hätte, aber keine Akkreditierung geben ist nicht nur unhöflich sondern auch ein Lizenzverstoß in diesem Fall... (Original: github.com/fishttp/awes...)

Nicht sehr sympathisch ein Community-Projekt impliziert als sein eigenes auszugeben und dafür spenden zu erbitten. Nicht dass auf Deutsch übersetzen keinen Wert hätte, aber keine Akkreditierung ist nicht nur unhöflich sondern auch ein Lizenzverstoß in dem Fall (Original: github.com/fishttp/awes...)

Don`t be fooled, you all forget that you have to mean forbidden curses for them to actually work. So Harry must be pulling a Pettigrew here, trying to blame Moe. That`s what becomes of kids if they spend too much time on X these days...

Gibt hier keine 5% Hürde, aber ja...

I don't know who gave you the idea that an open platform can be a safe space. Individuals here just have better tools, control and community for some stuff.
But some can slip through, like, you also implied that everyone who liked this post is a transphobe. So much for keeping this a safe space...

This is saying in different words "I prefer people doing and telling horrible things with a smile over people criticizing stuff that I could be held accountable for".

Well, based. Still, I wouldn`t support people who destroy the lives of everyone else just because some others are so annoying...

The other view does apparently collaps a thread after 10 self-replies with a "continue thread..." link, which is definitely missing in the threaded view where there's no indication that the thread goes on... Hope they add that to threaded view, but it being still "experimental" there's hope :)

The issue is definitely that a 20 posts thread is pushing it... Definitely not a bug, because the whole point of this view is that replies visually connect to what they respond to. Agree though that a fallback to display longer 5+ self reply threads initially on the same level would be nice.