I get where you're coming from. The image wasn't meant to suggest Trump is good for reform, but I see how it could give that impression. Thanks. The goal is to push for real, effective change, no matter who is in office. Let’s focus on holding leaders accountable for meaningful reform.

Fair point on the state by state approach it does have its limitations, much like your Waffle House analogy. It’s a starting point, not the endgame. As for the image, it wasn't meant to suggest Trump is good for MJ legislation, but to highlight the broader conversation. Like it or not, it's his call

You're right that Trump's stance on legalization hasn't been strong, and his AG pick reflects that. Legalization under his administration does lean towards corporate interests. Bi-partisan support is key for federal reform, but the state-by-state method allows local tailoring.

The Farm Bill did create some confusion, especially with the legality of certain cannabinoids like Delta-8. You're right that a clear federal policy is necessary to eliminate these gray areas. While Harris did campaign for legalization, it's worth noting that bipartisan support is growing.

Trump loves anything "states rights" oriented. As long as cannabis can be argued under a states rights platform, it serves his interests.