he can bend outcomes. History suggests he rarely stays in the background. Regulators won’t ignore that — influence is assessed by practical reality, not just by formal role descriptions

That’s exactly the crux of the problem. The question isn’t whether he has the title but whether, by virtue of stake and profile,

and it’s not an argument that will persuade anyone applying the standard.

or (2) that he meets the “fit and proper” criteria despite past controversies.

What won’t hold water is trying to step around the test by saying the sector is complicated and therefore the rules shouldn’t bite. That’s not how these determinations work,

If you want to make a serious case, it has to be rooted in the test as it actually stands. That means showing either (1) that Musk will not exercise managerial responsibility or influence — and remember the bar for “influence” is set deliberately low

Wishing you the best

Lol the fake mobman is a comedian

It's very clear, the Romanian

Well I'm the first

Do you know how much I love them

So cool

😂

Amazing 🤩😍