Are you sure they will allow radical books in US prisons? Don't they ban anything even slightly controversial?

90s music was good too. Grunge and metal were superb at the time.

Pretty mediocre from thereon, though, IMO.

Ok, but it wasn't.

That wasn't the highlight.

Fuck your paywall

archive.is/z8aek

What military triumph over Iran?

Ha ha. It's funny cuz it's true.

You were wrong. 😑

What a beauty!

Incredible that the Quillette team is still shilling for Israel in the midst of a genocide.

What a babe!

That's a very backwards way of looking at it. The borders are the cause of the conflicts, not people trying to reclaim their land.

Ok, some people care, obviously. Obviously there are some anti-smites. At the same time, there are a number of ppl who label criticism of Israel as AS. So...

Have I said this before? Anyway, I'm staying in a hotel in London after missing my flight. Don't have time for this, but you can easily Google them: Irgun and Lehi gangs.
You can also find quotes from early Zionists who talk about claiming as much land as possible despite border treaties.

Actually, many of the colonial borders all over the world, including Africa and the ME, are the causes of civil wars, border wars, and strife. Palestine is another example. Also, don't waste your time calling people AS for criticising Israel. Nobody cares anymore.

Taking as much area as possible. That was their stated intention. Fighting between the colonisers and the Palestinians are why the British eventually pulled out. There were roaming gangs of Jewish settlers terrorists terrorising the population. 2/2

Oh, sorry for applying standards like 'ethnic cleansing is bad'. The Americans and British colonised North America and we still view that as a morally abhorrent tragedy which is still now taught in history books.
In any case, you got your story wrong. The Zionist plan for the area involved 1/2

declaring your racist ethno-state on top of land which was already inhabited and in which the British had no right to give away to anybody.
2/2

1. Very well
2. Yes, that is the problem. UN181 was a general assembly partition plan. It was also non-binding. Almost none of the interested parties were consulted, and the ones who were firmly rejected it.
I don't give a shit what Jews do, I just won't accept the obvious injustice of 1/2

Why? They think it's more strategically beneficial for the state to prevent captives which can be used to make demands upon it, than it is politically costly to kill their own civilians.