Are they using it primarily for spellchecking and auto-complete?

Thanks for sharing.

The owl-faced butterfly 🦋

It *could* be a butterfly-faced owl but I don't think there are owls that intensely and beautifully blue.

IMHO any statement with a pointer to some vaguely specified 'them' group like "most of the podcasters making the big money" is rubbish.

(And the context here is calling out somene making generalisation about 'them' group 👀)

An interview style podcast can be a place of intellectual enquiry, a way of expanding your knowledge and understanding, piercing one's prejudices and illuminating one's blindspots. But it doesn't have to be - there is no magical guarantee. This medium suffers from the same risks as any soapbox.

Critical = important or crucial = sceptical?

The stick on the photo is amazing.

Come on man, without bonus bets and same day multis?

"No, the year 2000 was not 25 years ago; in 2025, it was 25 years ago."

This is so good!

Preferably a dormant one.

I've had the same experience about me being stupid.

Have you tried www.abc.net.au/listen/progr... ?

Aaaah...*break

Ah, since I broke it already let's brake it it further: Megatrons to Megawhats?

(There's a MAGA hat hiding there now)

Here's another:

From the early 90s for 20 years about 10 percent of all the electricity consumed in the USA had come from Soviet nuclear warheads.

"Megatrons to Megawatts"