Can't wait to see @qedscience.bsky.social commenting on works produced by platform.edisonscientific.com (arxiv.org/abs/2511.02824) and reading the rebuttal letter...

Correction: 40,000 spectators.

Could these unlucky applications be transferred and "re-used" to other funding agencies? A @reviewcommons.org for funding?

Those who confessed received my absolution for only a modest APC (Absolution Participation Charge)

Was a cool experience! I was very touched by the conversations. Did not expect this…

In the meantime, Claude 4 is out, and the progress continues, albeit clearly remaining subthreshold in many benchmarks. Probably a matter of time and/or dedicated (rogue) training efforts...

Claude 4 system card:
www-cdn.anthropic.com/6be99a52cb68...

Indeed, working on it as we speak!