Love your style of writing, so I would want to read it anyway. But I understand if you find it artistically unsatisfactory writing something too close to something existing.

AFAIU. Yes, there's a bubble. But it isn't in particular built on the premises that "it can think". The bubble is centered around, whether what LLMs actually can do, will be transformative to every single industry in existence. Spoiler alert. It will not. It will be for some.

Trump is upfront in saying he will use the shutdown to punish Democrats, and here are the receipts. About $27.2 billion cut from Dem districts compared to about $0.7 billion in GOP districts.
We all complain about the media, but need this type of in-depth journalism.
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...

Cannot recommend "Careless People" enough. Will give you a nice view of what that company's values actually are.

Hmm. I think, if the discussion is to be centered around critique of the status quo, then it should be fairly represented. I don't think that piece really achieves that.

Looks like something that would go well with a good beer

That's interesting 🤔. Is that because they just somehow require more flexibility in the setup, than what the standard packaging backends can reasonably provide, or is the support just a big chunk of work that no-one has gotten to yet? (Or something 3rd)

Wow, congrats. That's huge.

Not bad for a ... [CHECKS NOTES] ... content creation company.