I'm not
I am
I'm not
I am
But framing science as an absolute, as opposed to a method, only hurts the conversation.
But framing science as an absolute, as opposed to a method, only hurts the conversation.
That's what allows for improvement.
The question is not 'do you disagree with science,' but can you prove you disagreement.
That's called peer review and, therefore, progress.
Anything else is dogma.
That's what allows for improvement.
The question is not 'do you disagree with science,' but can you prove you disagreement.
That's called peer review and, therefore, progress.
Anything else is dogma.