Tim Takaro
timtakaro.bsky.social
Tim Takaro
@timtakaro.bsky.social
Physician-scientist in planetary health, active optimist and father of two.
Great that Parliamentarians will learn about CCS! This greenwash is unproven tech & cover for more fossil E emissions. The government/industry people who brought you heat dome deaths and record-breaking wildfires love it. "Decarbonized tarsands" defies physics. No taxpayer $ for dangerous ideas!
October 30, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Reposted by Tim Takaro
@timtakaro.bsky.social (CAPE physician, SFU researcher & study co-author): “LNG has taken centre stage in the Carney administration’s nation-building strategy, and yet we’re continuing to discover how poorly regulated this industry really is, particularly with respect to its risks to human health.”
September 25, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Government-Industry not telling the truth about flaring.
We show the large, unreported emissions from start-up years, happening right now with LNG Canada in Kitimat. We need BC energy regulator to protect people, not the fossil E industry. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...

From Tim's fairly smart phone
Analysis of Flaring Activity at Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Export Facilities Worldwide
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facilities are booming worldwide to supply gas for the growing energy demand. Flaring, the controlled burning of natural gas, occurs at these facilities during operations ranging from start-up to ongoing maintenance and under emergency situations. Although flaring can be a significant air pollutant and greenhouse gas emission source, little information exists on the frequency, duration, and volume of gas flared by LNG export facilities. This study leveraged ten years of data from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Night Fire (VNF) product associated with 48 existing LNG export facilities globally to develop probabilities of flaring at different life-cycle stages. We found a significantly higher volume of gas flared in the first two years of a facility’s operation (i.e., on average 1.9 (1.0–3.2) billion cubic meters (bcm) per capacity vs 0.62 (0.43–0.92) bcm during subsequent years). During regular operations, the annual volume of gas flared was correlated with the facility’s production capacity, and flaring varied greatly among facilities (148 (137–159) flaring days/year on average and 0.73 (0.64–0.85) bcm/capacity). Unfortunately, most environmental assessments overlook the start-up phase and fail to consider worst-case scenarios. As flaring is a source of air pollution, its potential health impacts on local populations may be underestimated in these assessments.
pubs.acs.org
September 23, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Maybe we should consider that widespread famine due to global heating from burning carbon fuels is a no-go-zone and we should switch our agricultural focus to growing food instead of fuel?
August 30, 2025 at 12:40 AM
What if we changed the name and tweaked the function of the Ministry of Defence to the Ministry of Peace and Security? Then we could meet NATO's 5% and put more money into peace and disarmament. Subsidizing the arms industries just feeds the death and destruction. What is real security anyway?
August 28, 2025 at 4:47 PM
Can anyone explain the rationale, to recall Elizabeth May, please? How many times has she tried to step down as leader and been called back up?
August 17, 2025 at 1:49 AM