Tim Sainburg
banner
timsainburg.bsky.social
Tim Sainburg
@timsainburg.bsky.social
Neuro, Cogsci, ML, and Ethology postdoc / Schmidt Science Fellow at Harvard.
Reposted by Tim Sainburg
September 4, 2025 at 10:08 AM
⭐ Long-term support: Actively maintained for 6+ years, 1700+ stars on GitHub, hundreds of citations (even without a paper!)
🐦 We also release Birdsong NOIZEUS, a new benchmark for bioacoustic denoising
September 2, 2025 at 6:54 PM
✅ Domain-general: strong baseline when ML models/data aren’t available
🎛️ Stationary & non-stationary variants
⚡ GPU-accelerated for real-time and high-throughput use
🧪 Validated across many domains
September 2, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Very cool @danielpollak.bsky.social @healeylab.bsky.social - this aligns with what I found in the starling paper we just published using a different context paradigm (sequence integration). NCM (among others) also does not show context modulation but sharpens acuity/attn with expectation
Expectation-driven sensory adaptations support enhanced acuity during categorical perception - Nature Neuroscience
Bayesian models explain how context biases perceptual behavior toward expected categories, but sensory neurons do not reflect this bias. Instead, expectation sharpens sensory acuity, independent of do...
www.nature.com
April 8, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Reposted by Tim Sainburg
Sensory populations reflect the Bayesian likelihood. And expectation modulates sensory activity. But here’s the twist: sensory neurons don’t integrate the likelihood and prior expectation. (6/n)
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Finally, this work is the product of an amazing team, in particular @trevorsupan.bsky.social and Tim Gentner! And a huge thank you to our reviewers and everyone who provided feedback throughout!
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
This was the longest project of my career! It started nine years ago, back in 2016, the second year of my PHD. Every paper I have ever published has been enveloped by this one.
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Takeaway:

1) Song sequence perception follows Bayesian integration.
2) Sensory populations reflect the likelihood, and are modulated by expectation, but don't follow Bayesian integration.
3) Instead, expectation refines sensory precision, leaving an unbiased signal for downstream processing.
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
This challenges the idea that sensory neurons integrate prior expectations the way decision-making circuits do. Instead, expectation boosts acuity where needed, letting decision-making systems flexibly integrate an unbiased sensory signal. (8/n)
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Instead of integrating expectations, neural populations enhance the likelihood of expected stimuli—sharpening perception rather than shifting it.
This means sensory systems maintain a veridical, faithful, representation of the world. (7/n)
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Sensory populations reflect the Bayesian likelihood. And expectation modulates sensory activity. But here’s the twist: sensory neurons don’t integrate the likelihood and prior expectation. (6/n)
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Behaviorally, birds integrate expectations and sensory input probabilistically, following a Bayesian strategy. This aligns with classic models of categorical perception. 5/n
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
To investigate this, we trained European starlings to classify ambiguous song syllables generated from a variational autoencoder. We manipulated expectation by changing the probabilities of syllables within song sequences. 4/n
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
We show that while decision-making systems integrate expectations probabilistically, sensory systems do something surprising: Rather than biasing perception, expectation sharpens it, enhancing sensory precision. 3/n
March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM