Watch live at:
www.youtube.com/live/SncN0yl...
Watch live at:
www.youtube.com/live/SncN0yl...
Created nice Method definition. Great would be if it automatically creates an empty body as well.
Created nice Method definition. Great would be if it automatically creates an empty body as well.
the proposal does not make sense at all.
cl_abap_testdouble=>create( cut )->expect( 'get_wbs_supplier' )->and_return( wbs_supplier_tab ).
It would be a person I'd say he have any clue about unit tests
the proposal does not make sense at all.
cl_abap_testdouble=>create( cut )->expect( 'get_wbs_supplier' )->and_return( wbs_supplier_tab ).
It would be a person I'd say he have any clue about unit tests
cp invents datatypes that do not exist. This is not of help.
The intention is to use cp to do the writing data ...
But somehow it needs to finde the data types
or ask for them
cp invents datatypes that do not exist. This is not of help.
The intention is to use cp to do the writing data ...
But somehow it needs to finde the data types
or ask for them
"create mock data for my unit test using cl_osql_test_environment and the following tables
zgt_wbs_archive zgt_wbs_customer zgt_wbs_supplier"
The result was not so much usable. Insert of test data was wrong... But I guess there is only a very little codebase as reference.
"create mock data for my unit test using cl_osql_test_environment and the following tables
zgt_wbs_archive zgt_wbs_customer zgt_wbs_supplier"
The result was not so much usable. Insert of test data was wrong... But I guess there is only a very little codebase as reference.
There is an Interface... but looks like copilot can not access the cotext attound ... to find the interface ... I will try again after opening those interfaces etc...
There is an Interface... but looks like copilot can not access the cotext attound ... to find the interface ... I will try again after opening those interfaces etc...
- here it looks like the copilot does not understand what a test class does. Syntax makes sense using "for testing ..." but implementation of the (not existing ) business interface does not make sense.
- here it looks like the copilot does not understand what a test class does. Syntax makes sense using "for testing ..." but implementation of the (not existing ) business interface does not make sense.
Using the chat the generation of a basic test class was working. An interface Type was invented that does not exist but anyway...
It would be great if you could write in the code the comad for copilot to generate a full test class.
Using the chat the generation of a basic test class was working. An interface Type was invented that does not exist but anyway...
It would be great if you could write in the code the comad for copilot to generate a full test class.
here is my first feedback:
1. installation is simple and fast, nice
2. Code completion are displayed and helpful. but sometimes not "intelligent" enough. But othen very helpful.
you will take some time to get used to it.
here is my first feedback:
1. installation is simple and fast, nice
2. Code completion are displayed and helpful. but sometimes not "intelligent" enough. But othen very helpful.
you will take some time to get used to it.